Literature DB >> 12706929

Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans: what is the warranty period of a normal scan?

Rory Hachamovitch1, Sean Hayes, John D Friedman, Ishac Cohen, Leslee J Shaw, Guido Germano, Daniel S Berman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of risk and the temporal characteristics of risk associated with normal myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS).
BACKGROUND: No empiric data exist regarding predictors of risk after normal MPS and their temporal characteristics.
METHODS: Follow-up (mean: 665 +/- 200 days, 96% complete) of 7,376 consecutive patients with normal exercise or adenosine MPS identified 78 hard events (HE) (45 cardiac deaths, 33 non-fatal myocardial infarction; 1.1% cumulative HE rate, 0.6%/year). Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify predictors of HE. Parametric survival analysis was used to model predicted time to HE.
RESULTS: The HE rates were greater in patients with versus without previous coronary artery disease (CAD). The Cox proportional hazards model identified pharmacologic stress, known CAD, diabetes mellitus (DM), male gender, and increasing age, with interactions between stress type and previous CAD (lower risk in patients without previous CAD undergoing exercise stress vs. all others) and between DM and gender (higher risk in DM females vs. all others) as the model most predictive of HE. The highest risk subgroups had a maximal event rate of 1.4% to 1.8%/year. Parametric survival models revealed that in patients without previous CAD the level of risk was uniform with time, but in patients with known CAD, risk increased with time (e.g., risk in the first year was less than in the second year, hence, a dynamic temporal component of risk was present).
CONCLUSIONS: Multiple clinical factors add incremental prognostic value in patients with normal MPS, affecting their risk and its temporal pattern, and may alter the appropriate timing of repeat testing, hence establishing the existence of a "warranty" period for normal MPS studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12706929     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00125-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  109 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The role of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging for asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Brian G Abbott; Timothy M Bateman; Ron Blankstein; Dennis A Calnon; Jeffrey A Leppo; Jamshid Maddahi; Matthew M Schumaecker; Leslee J Shaw; R Parker Ward; David G Wolinsky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment.

Authors:  M Pakkal; V Raj; G P McCann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Multiple testing, cumulative radiation dose, and clinical indications in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Shepard D Weiner; Adam Bernheim; Michal Kulon; Sabahat Bokhari; Lynne L Johnson; Jeffrey W Moses; Stephen Balter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Exercise and Bayes' Theorem: Some things never go out of style.

Authors:  Hong Jun Yun; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Assessing the prognostic implications of myocardial perfusion studies: identification of patients at risk vs patients who may benefit from intervention?

Authors:  Paul Cremer; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Coronary artery calcium scoring, what is answered and what questions remain.

Authors:  George Youssef; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

Review 8.  Survival analysis and regression models.

Authors:  Brandon George; Samantha Seals; Inmaculada Aban
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Mario Petretta; Renato Cuocolo; Stefania Daniele; Valeria Cantoni; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Impact of choice of imaging modality accompanying outpatient exercise stress testing on outcomes and resource use after revascularization for acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jerome J Federspiel; Bimal R Shah; Leslee J Shaw; Frederick A Masoudi; Patricia P Chang; Sally C Stearns; Daniel W Mudrick; Patricia A Cowper; Cynthia L Green; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.