Literature DB >> 25173444

Risk stratification by regadenoson stress magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Siddique A Abbasi1, Bobak Heydari1, Ravi V Shah1, Venkatesh L Murthy1, Ying Yi Zhang1, Ron Blankstein1, Michael Steigner1, Michael Jerosch-Herold1, Raymond Y Kwong2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and inducible ischemia on regadenoson cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) performed at 3.0 T. Regadenoson stress CMR MPI is increasingly used to assess patients with suspected ischemia; however, its value in patient prognostication and risk reclassification is only emerging. A total of 346 patients with suspected ischemia who were referred for regadenoson CMR were studied. The prognostic association of presence of inducible ischemia by CMR with MACEs was determined. In addition, we assessed the extent of net reclassification improvement by CMR beyond a clinical risk model. There were 52 MACEs during a median follow-up period of 1.9 years. Patients with inducible ischemia were fourfold more likely to experience MACEs (hazard ratio, 4.14, 95% confidence interval 2.37 to 7.24, p <0.0001). In the best overall model, presence of inducible ischemia conferred a 2.6-fold increased hazard for MACEs adjusted to known clinical risk markers (adjusted hazard ratio 2.59, 95% confidence interval 1.30 to 5.18, p = 0.0069). Patients with no inducible ischemia experienced a low rate of cardiac death and myocardial infarction (0.6% per patient-year), whereas those with inducible ischemia had an annual event rate of 3.2%. Net reclassification improvement across risk categories (low <5%, intermediate 5% to 10%, and high >10%) by CMR was 0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.44), and continuous net reclassification improvement was 0.58. In conclusion, in patients with clinical suspicion of myocardial ischemia, regadenoson stress CMR MPI provides robust risk stratification. CMR MPI negative for ischemia was associated with a very low annual rate of hard cardiac events. In addition, CMR MPI provides effective risk reclassification in a substantial proportion of patients.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25173444      PMCID: PMC4380519          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

1.  A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of regadenoson, an adenosine A2A-receptor agonist, in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Toufigh Gordi; Paul Frohna; Hai-Ling Sun; Andrew Wolff; Luiz Belardinelli; Hsiao Lieu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Stephan D Fihn; Julius M Gardin; Jonathan Abrams; Kathleen Berra; James C Blankenship; Apostolos P Dallas; Pamela S Douglas; Joanne M Foody; Thomas C Gerber; Alan L Hinderliter; Spencer B King; Paul D Kligfield; Harlan M Krumholz; Raymond Y K Kwong; Michael J Lim; Jane A Linderbaum; Michael J Mack; Mark A Munger; Richard L Prager; Joseph F Sabik; Leslee J Shaw; Joanna D Sikkema; Craig R Smith; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Sankey V Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Comparison of the prognostic value of normal regadenoson with normal adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Fahad M Iqbal; Fadi G Hage; Ali Ahmed; Phillip J Dean; Saleem Raslan; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10

5.  Cardiac care for older adults. Time for a new paradigm.

Authors:  Daniel E Forman; Michael W Rich; Karen P Alexander; Susan Zieman; Mathew S Maurer; Samer S Najjar; Joseph C Cleveland; Harlan M Krumholz; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain.

Authors:  W Patricia Ingkanisorn; Raymond Y Kwong; Nicole S Bohme; Nancy L Geller; Kenneth L Rhoads; Christopher K Dyke; D Ian Paterson; Mushabbar A Syed; Anthony H Aletras; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion.

Authors:  I Paetsch; C Jahnke; A Wahl; R Gebker; M Neuss; E Fleck; E Nagel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Considerations when measuring myocardial perfusion reserve by cardiovascular magnetic resonance using regadenoson.

Authors:  Nicole M Bhave; Benjamin H Freed; Chattanong Yodwut; Denise Kolanczyk; Karin Dill; Roberto M Lang; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial.

Authors:  John P Greenwood; Neil Maredia; John F Younger; Julia M Brown; Jane Nixon; Colin C Everett; Petra Bijsterveld; John P Ridgway; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Catherine J Dickinson; Stephen G Ball; Sven Plein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Benjamin H Freed; Akhil Narang; Nicole M Bhave; Peter Czobor; Victor Mor-Avi; Emily R Zaran; Kristen M Turner; Kevin P Cavanaugh; Sonal Chandra; Sara M Tanaka; Michael H Davidson; Roberto M Lang; Amit R Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  CT myocardial perfusion imaging: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Yang; Young-Hak Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Prognostic value of normal positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A'Di Chen; HaoSen Wang; Bing Fan; YaWei Xu; Wei Chen; Neng Dai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Effects of adenosine and regadenoson on hemodynamics measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Dustin M Thomas; Matthew R Minor; James K Aden; Christopher J Lisanti; Kevin E Steel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Evaluation of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Risk Reclassification of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Panagiotis Antiochos; Yin Ge; Kevin Steel; Yi-Yun Chen; Scott Bingham; Shuaib Abdullah; J Ronald Mikolich; Andrew E Arai; W Patricia Bandettini; Amit R Patel; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; John F Heitner; Chetan Shenoy; Steve W Leung; Jorge A Gonzalez; Dipan J Shah; Subha V Raman; Victor A Ferrari; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Matthias Stuber; Orlando P Simonetti; Venkatesh L Murthy; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

5.  Prognostic Value of Quantitative Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Eva C Sammut; Adriana D M Villa; Gabriella Di Giovine; Luke Dancy; Filippo Bosio; Thomas Gibbs; Swarna Jeyabraba; Susanne Schwenke; Steven E Williams; Michael Marber; Khaled Alfakih; Tevfik F Ismail; Reza Razavi; Amedeo Chiribiri
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-11-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.