Literature DB >> 21256467

Survival by stress modality in patients with a normal myocardial perfusion study.

Nils P Johnson1, Daniel R Schimmel, Sean P Dyer, Scott M Leonard, Thomas A Holly.   

Abstract

We sought to determine the differential prognosis of patients with a normal single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) perfusion study by type of stress modality. Even with a normal SPECT perfusion study, patients selected for adenosine stress have a worse survival than those selected for exercise stress. In patients who are able, low-level treadmill exercise is commonly performed during adenosine infusion ("walking" adenosine). The adjusted differential prognosis of patients performing walking adenosine is unknown. Our historical cohort underwent adenosine or treadmill stress with SPECT imaging during 2003 and 2004. Adenosine studies were classified as walking or adenosine only (no low-level exercise). Patients with an abnormal single-photon emission computed tomogram or missing demographic information were excluded. All-cause mortality was determined through July 2008. In total 3,479 patients were included, of which 1,451 (41.7%) were stressed with adenosine only, 201 (5.8%) with walking adenosine, and 1,827 (52.5%) with treadmill exercise. Over an average of 4.3 ± 1.0 years of follow-up, 307 (8.8%) died. Mortality was greatest for adenosine only, intermediate for walking adenosine, and least for exercise (p <0.001 by log-rank test), even after accounting for covariates (adjusted hazard ratio for walking adenosine 0.57, p = 0.044). In conclusion, patients with a normal SPECT perfusion scan who are able to undergo an adenosine protocol in conjunction with exercise have an intermediate prognosis between those who cannot perform low-level exercise and patients able to undergo full treadmill exercise. This differential survival remains significant after adjustment, perhaps because of differences in baseline functional capacity.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21256467     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

1.  Beyond ischemia evaluation: The potential for assessing and addressing physical inactivity in the cardiac stress laboratory.

Authors:  Seth Uretsky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Looking at the whole picture.

Authors:  Michael J Zellweger
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Differences in Clinical Characteristics, Results and Management of Patients Referred for Pharmacologic Cardiac Stress SPECT Depending on the Protocol Used.

Authors:  Pablo Del Castillo; Núria Casanovas; Marcel Santaló; Fernando Narro; Ana Paula Caresia; Ana Barradas; Walter Bragagnini; Joan Carles Martin; Laura Guillamon; Lluís Bernà; Antoni Martínez-Rubio
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2017-12

4.  Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging provides effective cardiac risk reclassification in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ravi Shah; Bobak Heydari; Otavio Coelho-Filho; Venkatesh L Murthy; Siddique Abbasi; Jiazhuo H Feng; Michael Pencina; Tomas G Neilan; Judith L Meadows; Sanjeev Francis; Ron Blankstein; Michael Steigner; Marcelo di Carli; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Predictive value of exercise myocardial perfusion imaging in the Medicare population: the impact of the ability to exercise.

Authors:  Deborah H Kwon; Venu Menon; Penny Houghtaling; Elizabeth Lieber; Richard C Brunken; Manuel D Cerqueira; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-02

6.  Stress myocardial perfusion imaging in the elderly.

Authors:  Atif Alzahrani; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Prognostic implications of stress modality on mortality risk and cause of death in patients undergoing office-based SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Marie-France Poulin; Sarah Alexander; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Warranty periods for normal myocardial perfusion stress SPECT.

Authors:  Guillermo Romero-Farina; Jaume Candell-Riera; Santiago Aguadé-Bruix; Ignacio Ferreira-González; Gemma Cuberas-Borrós; Nazarena Pizzi; David García-Dorado
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Prognosis in patients with suspected or known ischemic heart disease and normal myocardial perfusion: long-term outcome and temporal risk variations.

Authors:  Jane A Simonsen; Oke Gerke; Charlotte K Rask; Mohammad Tamadoni; Anders Thomassen; Søren Hess; Allan Johansen; Hans Mickley; Lisette O Jensen; Jesper Hallas; Werner Vach; Poul F Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Predictive variables for hard cardiac events and coronary revascularization in patients with normal left ventricular myocardial perfusion and systolic function.

Authors:  Guillermo Romero-Farina; Jaume Candell-Riera; Santiago Aguadé-Bruix; Gemma Cuberas-Borrós; Ignacio Ferreira-González; María Nazarena Pizzi; Gustavo de León; Alba Santos; David García-Dorado
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.