Literature DB >> 23801484

Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Western Australia: a population-based analysis of trends and peri-operative complications.

Fiona J Hunt1, C D'Arcy J Holman, Kristjana Einarsdottir, Rachael E Moorin, Nicolas Tsokos.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We previously described a declining rate of surgery in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in Western Australia. This paper builds on previous work by examining temporal trends and the post-operative risk of in-hospital complications, following first time incident prolapse surgery in a population-based cohort of women.
METHODS: We investigated rates of prolapse surgery between 1988 and 2005 according to age group and concomitant procedure type for 34,509 women whose data were extracted from the WA Data Linkage System. We investigated changes over time in the demographic characteristics of women undergoing surgery and whether the presence of selected concomitant procedures increased the risk of in-hospital complications.
RESULTS: During the study period, 34,509 women underwent an incident surgery for POP. Concomitant hysterectomy was performed in more than half of all surgeries (52.4 %) and a concomitant urinary incontinence (UI) surgery was noted in 25.8 %. 10.9 % of patients experienced a complication of interest, with the highest percentage of complications recorded in women who underwent multi-concomitant surgery. After controlling for age, comorbidity and time period we found that concomitant UI surgery increases in-hospital complications (OR 1.61 95 % CI 1.42-1.83) only in women who have a repair procedure (colporrhaphy and/or enterocele repair). There was no significant effect of concomitant procedures in women who underwent a combined repair and apical prolapse procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery to treat prolapse is common, has low mortality and concomitant surgery only increases complications when combined with simpler prolapse surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23801484     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2149-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  25 in total

1.  Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Boyles; Anne M Weber; Leslie Meyn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Fiona J Smith; C D'Arcy J Holman; Rachael E Moorin; Nicolas Tsokos
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Hospital chart review provided more accurate comorbidity information than data from a general practitioner survey or an administrative database.

Authors:  David B Preen; C D'Arcy J Holman; David M Lawrence; Natalya J Baynham; James B Semmens
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Rate, type, and cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Germany, France, and England.

Authors:  Dhinagar Subramanian; Karine Szwarcensztein; Josephine A Mauskopf; Mark C Slack
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Age-related trends in female stress urinary incontinence surgery in Australia - Medicare data for 1994-2009.

Authors:  Joseph Lee; Peter L Dwyer
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.100

6.  Perioperative complications of surgery for genital prolapse: does concomitant anti-incontinence surgery increase complications?

Authors:  Victoria L Handa; Lynn Harvey; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Kristen H Kjerulff
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997.

Authors:  Jeanette S Brown; L Elaine Waetjen; Leslee L Subak; David H Thom; Stephen Van den Eeden; Eric Vittinghoff
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  The age distribution, rates, and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the USA.

Authors:  Aparna D Shah; Neeraj Kohli; Sujatha S Rajan; Lennox Hoyte
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-20

10.  Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdel-Fattah; Akinbowale Familusi; Shona Fielding; John Ford; Sohinee Bhattacharya
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.