Literature DB >> 15780360

Perioperative complications of surgery for genital prolapse: does concomitant anti-incontinence surgery increase complications?

Victoria L Handa1, Lynn Harvey, Geoffrey W Cundiff, Kristen H Kjerulff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish whether the short-term risks of prolapse surgery are increased by a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure.
METHODS: Using data from the past 4 years of the National Hospital Discharge Survey, we identified women admitted for surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (specifically, suspension of the vagina or obliteration of the cul-de-sac, with or without concomitant hysterectomy or vaginal repairs). We identified women diagnosed with complications (including infections, bleeding complications, surgical injuries, pulmonary complications, and cardiovascular complications). We used multiple logistic regression analysis to compare women with and without complications with respect to concurrent continence procedures, controlling for demographic characteristics, concurrent procedures, and medical comorbidity (using the Charlson index).
RESULTS: Of the 1931 women who underwent prolapse surgery, concomitant anti-incontinence procedures were performed in 514 (26.6%). Complications were reported in 288 patients (14.9%) and were associated with medical comorbidity (odds ratio 11.2) and concomitant hysterectomy (odds ratio 1.5). Concomitant surgery for incontinence was not associated with an increased risk of complications.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that medical comorbidity is strongly associated with complications after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. A concomitant anti-incontinence procedure did not significantly increase the immediate morbidity of prolapse surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15780360     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

1.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Western Australia: a population-based analysis of trends and peri-operative complications.

Authors:  Fiona J Hunt; C D'Arcy J Holman; Kristjana Einarsdottir; Rachael E Moorin; Nicolas Tsokos
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Feasibility and patient satisfaction with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence day surgery.

Authors:  C H van der Vaart; B H C Lamers; A P M Heintz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-08-24

3.  Complications in women undergoing Burch colposuspension versus autologous rectus fascial sling for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Toby C Chai; Michael E Albo; Holly E Richter; Peggy A Norton; Kimberly J Dandreo; Kimberly Kenton; Jerry L Lowder; Anne M Stoddard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Trends and Factors Influencing Inpatient Prolapse Surgical Costs and Length of Stay in the United States.

Authors:  Tatiana V D Sanses; Nicholas K Schiltz; Holly E Richter; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.091

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.