Literature DB >> 19414209

Rate, type, and cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Germany, France, and England.

Dhinagar Subramanian1, Karine Szwarcensztein, Josephine A Mauskopf, Mark C Slack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rate, type and costs of surgical interventions for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in Germany, France, and England. STUDY
DESIGN: We identified the number, rate, and type of hospital admissions for pelvic floor surgery in 2005 from national hospital activity databases in each country: the German Hospital Episode, the French Medical Care Program Information System, and the National Health Service England Hospital Episode Statistics. Costs to the payer were estimated using the Diagnosis-Related Group reimbursement rates for each country.
RESULTS: In 2005, the number (rate) of admissions for POP surgery was 36,854 (0.87 per 1000 women) in Germany, 36,679 (1.14 per 1000 women) in France, and 28,959 (1.13 per 1000 women) in England. Admissions for POP surgery constituted 10.4%, 16.7% and 16.9% of all admissions for female genital tract therapeutic interventions in Germany, France and England, respectively. At least 20% of hysterectomies were performed for the primary indication of POP. 57.4%, 45.0%, and 40.1% of all admissions for POP surgery included a hysterectomy. The costs to payers were 144,236,557 euro, 83,067,825 euro, and 81,030,907 euro in Germany, France, and England, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Burden and costs associated with POP surgery are substantial in the three countries studied. Thus, programs aimed at reducing the burden of this disease are desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19414209     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  15 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  O E O'Sullivan; B A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maribel De Gouveia De Sa; Leica Sarah Claydon; Barry Whitlow; Maria Angelica Dolcet Artahona
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Cecilia Cheon; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Twenty years of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: where are we now?

Authors:  Boris Gabriel; Joseph Nassif; Sonia Barata; Arnaud Wattiez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Western Australia: a population-based analysis of trends and peri-operative complications.

Authors:  Fiona J Hunt; C D'Arcy J Holman; Kristjana Einarsdottir; Rachael E Moorin; Nicolas Tsokos
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The challenge of implementing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jan Deprest; Ladislav Krofta; Frank Van der Aa; Alfredo L Milani; Jan Den Boon; Filip Claerhout; Jan-Paul Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Godfrey J A Walker; Prasanna Gunasekera
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  International urogynecology consultation chapter 1 committee 2: Epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence, incidence, natural history, and service needs.

Authors:  Heidi W Brown; Aparna Hegde; Markus Huebner; Hedwig Neels; Hayley C Barnes; Gisele Vissoci Marquini; Narmin Mukhtarova; Bernard Mbwele; Visha Tailor; Ervin Kocjancic; Elisa Trowbridge; Lynsey Hayward
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maribel De Gouveia De Sa; Leica Sarah Claydon; Barry Whitlow; Maria Angelica Dolcet Artahona
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Screening of the pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination; (a community based study).

Authors:  Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani; Somayeh Hashemi; Masoumeh Simbar; Niloofar Shiva
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.