Literature DB >> 23792605

Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Cem Onal1, Mehmet Reyhan, Cem Parlak, Ozan Cem Guler, Ezgi Oymak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the correlation of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake into primary tumors using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and clinicopathological factors of disease. The impact of the pretreatment SUVmax of the primary tumor on survival was investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 149 patients with biopsy-proven cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (ChRT) were reviewed. All patients underwent pretreatment FDG positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and posttherapy FDG positron emission tomography with computed tomography was performed within a median interval of 4.2 months (range, 3.0-11.2 months) after the completion of chemoradiotherapy.
RESULTS: The mean SUVmax in patients with lymph node metastasis was significantly higher than that in patients without metastasis (19.7 ± 8.2 vs 16.4 ± 8.2, respectively; P = 0.01). A significant difference existed between tumor size (<4 vs ≥4 cm) and the primary tumor SUVmax (14.7 ± 6.6 vs 18.7 ± 8.5, respectively; P = 0.02). The primary tumor pretreatment SUVmax for patients with complete remission was significantly lower than that of patients with partial response or progressive disease (15.6 ± 5.7 vs 28.0 ± 9.9, respectively; P < 0.001). The relationship between primary tumor FDG uptake and survival was evaluated by the cutoff value determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The area under the curve was 0.901 (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.848-0.954), and 15.6 was determined as the SUVmax cutoff value. The 4-year actuarial overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival for SUVmax of less than 15.6 compared with SUVmax of 15.6 or greater were 85% vs 34% (P < 0.001) and 80% vs 29%, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, age, SUVmax of 15.6 or greater, and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors of OS, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB or higher, SUVmax of 15.6 or greater, and lymph node metastasis were significant factors for disease-free survival.
CONCLUSION: The primary tumor pretreatment SUVmax is correlated with increased tumor size and lymph node involvement at diagnosis, how well the primary tumor responds to treatment, the likelihood of disease recurrence, and OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23792605     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182989483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  19 in total

1.  Treatment outcomes of patients with cervical cancer with complete metabolic responses after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Mehmet Reyhan; Ozan C Guler; Ali Fuat Yapar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Pretreatment metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis are not independent prognosticators for locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Ozan Cem Guler; Nese Torun; Berna Akkus Yildirim; Cem Onal
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Isolated jejunal metastasis in a patient with cervical cancer: A case report.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Gul Nihal Nursal; Nurkan Torer; Fazilet Kayaselcuk
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-01-05

4.  Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Outcome in Cervical Cancer After Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Jennifer C Ho; Pamela K Allen; Priya R Bhosale; Gaiane M Rauch; Clifton D Fuller; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Michael Frumovitz; Anuja Jhingran; Ann H Klopp
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Tumour and pelvic lymph node metabolic activity on FDG-PET/CT to stratify patients for para-aortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  A Martinez; M Voglimacci; A Lusque; A Ducassou; L Gladieff; N Dupuis; M A Angeles; C Martinez; Y Tanguy Le Gac; E Chantalat; A Hitzel; F Courbon; G Ferron; E Gabiache
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  The role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in predicting the histopathological response in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated by chemo-radiotherapy followed by radical surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Vittoria Rufini; Angela Collarino; Maria Lucia Calcagni; Guido Maria Meduri; Valentina Fuoco; Tina Pasciuto; Antonia Carla Testa; Gabriella Ferrandina; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Maura Campitelli; Benedetta Gui; Gianfranco Zannoni; Riccardo Manfredi; Giovanni Scambia; Alessandro Giordano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Volumetric assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient predicts outcome following chemoradiation for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer C Ho; Penny Fang; Carlos E Cardenas; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Clifton D Fuller; Pamela K Allen; Priya R Bhosale; Michael M Frumovitz; Anuja Jhingran; Ann H Klopp
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Increased expression of stanniocalcin 2 is associated with tumor progression after radiotherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Jian Shen; Ke Gu; Jian-Ping Shi; Jian-Qin Yao; Jin-Chang Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-12-01

9.  Glutaminase Inhibitors Induce Thiol-Mediated Oxidative Stress and Radiosensitization in Treatment-Resistant Cervical Cancers.

Authors:  Ramachandran Rashmi; Kay Jayachandran; Jin Zhang; Vishnu Menon; Naoshad Muhammad; Michael Zahner; Fiona Ruiz; Sisi Zhang; Kevin Cho; Yuting Wang; Xiaojing Huang; Yi Huang; Michael L McCormick; Buck E Rogers; Douglas R Spitz; Gary J Patti; Julie K Schwarz
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 10.  What's New in Imaging for Gynecologic Cancer?

Authors:  Sairah R Khan; Mubarik Arshad; Kathryn Wallitt; Victoria Stewart; Nishat Bharwani; Tara D Barwick
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.