Literature DB >> 28011045

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Outcome in Cervical Cancer After Chemoradiation.

Jennifer C Ho1, Pamela K Allen1, Priya R Bhosale2, Gaiane M Rauch2, Clifton D Fuller1, Abdallah S R Mohamed3, Michael Frumovitz4, Anuja Jhingran1, Ann H Klopp5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value is predictive of survival after definitive chemoradiation for cervical cancer independent of established imaging and clinical prognostic factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2011 and 2013, the pretreatment MRI scans for 69 patients treated with definitive chemoradiation for newly diagnosed cervical cancer were retrieved. Scans were acquired with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner, including diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. Mean ADC value was measured within a region of interest in the primary cervical cancer on the baseline MRI scan. Baseline tumor maximum standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography/computed tomography was determined by the reading radiologist. Treatment included external beam radiation therapy to the pelvis followed by brachytherapy in 97%, and with concurrent weekly cisplatin in 99% of patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to investigate the association of clinical and imaging variables with disease control and survival endpoints using a Cox proportional hazard test.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 16.7 months (range, 3.1-44.2 months). The 1-year overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and disease-free survival rates were 91%, 86%, and 74%, respectively. The median ADC value was 0.941 × 10-3 mm2/s (range, 0.256-1.508 × 10-3 mm2/s). The median standardized uptake value in the primary tumor was 15 (range, 6.2-43.4). In multivariate analysis, higher ADC value (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.85, P=.02), higher stage (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.5, P=.033), and nonsquamous histology (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.82, P=.024) were independent predictors of disease-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The mean ADC value of the primary tumor on pretreatment MRI was the only imaging feature that was an independent predictor of disease-free survival in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation. Further validation will be needed to determine whether ADC values may prove useful in identifying cervical patients at high risk of recurrence.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011045      PMCID: PMC6112612          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  41 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET/CT can predict nodal metastases but not recurrence in early stage uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Cinzia Crivellaro; Mauro Signorelli; Luca Guerra; Elena De Ponti; Alessandro Buda; Carlotta Dolci; Cecilia Pirovano; Sergio Todde; Robert Fruscio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in assessing radiotherapy and chemotherapy success in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Zhan-Zhao Fu; Yong Peng; Li-Yan Cao; Yan-Sheng Chen; Kun Li; Bao-Hong Fu
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  The value of diffusion-weighted MRI to evaluate the response to radiochemotherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fei Kuang; Ziping Yan; Jian Wang; Ziyuan Rao
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Mehmet Reyhan; Cem Parlak; Ozan Cem Guler; Ezgi Oymak
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  W A Peters; P Y Liu; R J Barrett; R J Stock; B J Monk; J S Berek; L Souhami; P Grigsby; W Gordon; D S Alberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Renju Bai; Haoran Sun; Haidong Liu; Dehua Wang
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01.

Authors:  Patricia J Eifel; Kathryn Winter; Mitchell Morris; Charles Levenback; Perry W Grigsby; Jay Cooper; Marvin Rotman; David Gershenson; David G Mutch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Z McVeigh; Aejaz M Syed; Michael Milosevic; Anthony Fyles; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Novel imaging techniques as response biomarkers in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Vanessa N Harry
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Pre-treatment diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting tumor recurrence in uterine cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation: value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients.

Authors:  Suk Hee Heo; Sang Soo Shin; Jin Woong Kim; Hyo Soon Lim; Yong Yeon Jeong; Woo Dae Kang; Seok Mo Kim; Heoung Keun Kang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and geometric distortion on a 0.35T MR-LINAC at multiple gantry angles.

Authors:  Benjamin Lewis; Anamaria Guta; Stacie Mackey; H Michael Gach; Sasa Mutic; Olga Green; Taeho Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018.

Authors:  Lucia Manganaro; Yulia Lakhman; Nishat Bharwani; Benedetta Gui; Silvia Gigli; Valeria Vinci; Stefania Rizzo; Aki Kido; Teresa Margarida Cunha; Evis Sala; Andrea Rockall; Rosemarie Forstner; Stephanie Nougaret
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Volumetric assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient predicts outcome following chemoradiation for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer C Ho; Penny Fang; Carlos E Cardenas; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Clifton D Fuller; Pamela K Allen; Priya R Bhosale; Michael M Frumovitz; Anuja Jhingran; Ann H Klopp
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Role of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Derived Parameters as Imaging Biomarkers and Correlation with Clinicopathological Features in Carcinoma of Uterine Cervix.

Authors:  Ramireddy Jeba Karunya; Putta Tharani; Subhashini John; Ramani Manoj Kumar; Saikat Das
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

Review 5.  The transformation of radiation oncology using real-time magnetic resonance guidance: A review.

Authors:  William A Hall; Eric S Paulson; Uulke A van der Heide; Clifton D Fuller; B W Raaymakers; Jan J W Lagendijk; X Allen Li; David A Jaffray; Laura A Dawson; Beth Erickson; Marcel Verheij; Kevin J Harrington; Arjun Sahgal; Percy Lee; Parag J Parikh; Michael F Bassetti; Clifford G Robinson; Bruce D Minsky; Ananya Choudhury; Robert J H A Tersteeg; Christopher J Schultz
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Standardized Uptake Value for 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Is a Marker of Inflammatory State and Immune Infiltrate in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  John M Floberg; Jin Zhang; Naoshad Muhammad; Todd A DeWees; Matthew Inkman; Kevin Chen; Alexander J Lin; Ramachandran Rashmi; Kay Jayachandran; Brian T Edelson; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby; Stephanie Markovina; Julie K Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Diffusion-weighted MRI-derived ADC values reflect collagen I content in PDX models of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Anette Hauge; Catherine S Wegner; Jon-Vidar Gaustad; Trude G Simonsen; Lise Mari K Andersen; Einar K Rofstad
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-11

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging features of tumor and lymph node to predict clinical outcome in node-positive cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Shin-Hyung Park; Myong Hun Hahm; Bong Kyung Bae; Gun Oh Chong; Shin Young Jeong; Sungdae Na; Sungmoon Jeong; Jae-Chul Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Pre-treatment DWI as a predictor of overall survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with Cyberknife radiotherapy and sequential S-1 therapy.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Xiaofei Zhu; Denghui Liu; Jiaqi Song; Huojun Zhang; Jianping Lu
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Spatial relationship of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion imaging metrics in cervical cancer.

Authors:  John M Floberg; Kathryn J Fowler; Dominique Fuser; Todd A DeWees; Farrokh Dehdashti; Barry A Siegel; Richard L Wahl; Julie K Schwarz; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.