Literature DB >> 23791218

Prospective analysis of the surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction rate after the AMS Spectra penile prosthesis implantation.

Marco Falcone1, Luigi Rolle, Carlo Ceruti, Massimiliano Timpano, Omidreza Sedigh, Mirko Preto, Andrea Gonella, Bruno Frea.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes, the patients', and their partners' satisfaction concerning the AMS Spectra penile prosthesis implantation.
METHODS: Twenty-two unresponsive or dissatisfied patients with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor oral therapy or prostaglandin intracavernous injection underwent a Spectra penile prosthesis implantation. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. The preoperative erectile dysfunction (ED) was rated by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. The patients and their partners were submitted to the IIEF and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaires through telephonic interviews at the third, sixth, and 12th months after the penile surgery.
RESULTS: This study demonstrates that 86.4% of the patients and 52.6% of their partners are satisfied by the AMS Spectra penile prosthesis. The preoperative average IIEF score was equal to 28.5 (range 13-39). The postoperative IIEF rates were 47.7 (43-53), 51.8 (48-58), and 53.9 (50-58) at the third, sixth, and 12th months, respectively. The patient average EDITS score amounted to 39.5 (31-48), 43.4 (36-50), and 45.2 (38-50) at the third, sixth, and 12th months, respectively. The increase between the preoperative and postoperative IIEF parameters resulted to be statistically significant (P <.05) as well as the increase in EDITS at the third, sixth, and 12th months postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: The AMS Spectra is a reliable device to treat ED as shown by the high grade of the patients' satisfaction. Moreover, the AMS Spectra is highly convenient in terms of cost savings in comparison to an inflatable device. In selected patients, this prosthesis should be considered as an effective solution to treat severe ED.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23791218     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  16 in total

Review 1.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Current Status for Semirigid Penile Prosthetic Devices.

Authors:  Raul E Fernandez-Crespo; Kristina Buscaino; Justin Parker; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Long-term outcomes of AMS Spectra® penile prosthesis implantation and satisfaction rates.

Authors:  F Akdemir; E Okulu; Ö Kayıgil
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  Satisfaction assessment with malleable prosthetic implant of Spectra (AMS) and Genesis (Coloplast) models.

Authors:  A R Casabé; N Sarotto; C Gutierrez; A J Bechara
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 5.  Dual implantation of penile prosthesis and ATOMS® system for post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Marco Falcone; Mirko Preto; Enrico Ammirati; Gideon Blecher; Roberto Carone; Paolo Gontero; Alessandro Giammò
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 6.  Evaluation and Management of Erectile Dysfunction in the Hypertensive Patient.

Authors:  Jay Pravin Patel; Eric Hweegeun Lee; Carlos Ignacio Mena-Hurtado; Charles N Walker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Current management of penile implant infections, device reliability, and optimizing cosmetic outcome.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Andrew Kramer; William O Brant; Justin L Parker; Paul E Perito; Jeremy B Myers; Richard Bryson; Meagan Dunne
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Patient and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution.

Authors:  Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Burak Arslan; Tarik Yonguc; Zafer Kozacıoglu; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Suleyman Minareci
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 9.  Role of Penile Prosthesis in Priapism: A Review.

Authors:  Amit G Reddy; Laith M Alzweri; Andrew T Gabrielson; Gabriel Leinwand; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 10.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.