OBJECTIVE: Quantification of chiropractic high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation (HVLA-SM) may require biomechanical equipment capable of sampling data at high rates. However, there are few studies reported in the literature regarding the minimal sampling rate required to record the HVLA-SM force-time profile data accurately and precisely. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different sampling rates on the quantification of forces, durations, and rates of loading of simulated side posture lumbar spine HVLA-SM delivered by doctors of chiropractic. METHODS: Five doctors of chiropractic (DCs) and 5 asymptomatic participants were recruited for this study. Force-time profiles were recorded during (i) 52 simulated HVLA-SM thrusts to a force transducer placed on a force plate by 2 DCs and (ii) 12 lumbar side posture HVLA-SM on 5 participants by 3 DCs. Data sampling rate of the force plate remained the same at 1000 Hz, whereas the sampling rate of the force transducer varied at 50, 100, 200, and 500 Hz. The data were reduced using custom-written MATLAB (Mathworks, Inc, Natick, MA) and MathCad (version 15; Parametric Technologies, Natick, MA) programs and analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: The average differences in the computed durations and rates of loading are smaller than 5% between 50 and 1000 Hz sampling rates. The differences in the computed preloads and peak loads are smaller than 3%. CONCLUSIONS: The small differences observed in the characteristics of force-time profiles of simulated manual HVLA-SM thrusts measured using various sampling rates suggest that a sampling rate as low as 50 to 100 Hz may be sufficient. The results are applicable to the manipulation performed in this study: manual side posture lumbar spine HVLA-SM.
OBJECTIVE: Quantification of chiropractic high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation (HVLA-SM) may require biomechanical equipment capable of sampling data at high rates. However, there are few studies reported in the literature regarding the minimal sampling rate required to record the HVLA-SM force-time profile data accurately and precisely. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different sampling rates on the quantification of forces, durations, and rates of loading of simulated side posture lumbar spine HVLA-SM delivered by doctors of chiropractic. METHODS: Five doctors of chiropractic (DCs) and 5 asymptomatic participants were recruited for this study. Force-time profiles were recorded during (i) 52 simulated HVLA-SM thrusts to a force transducer placed on a force plate by 2 DCs and (ii) 12 lumbar side posture HVLA-SM on 5 participants by 3 DCs. Data sampling rate of the force plate remained the same at 1000 Hz, whereas the sampling rate of the force transducer varied at 50, 100, 200, and 500 Hz. The data were reduced using custom-written MATLAB (Mathworks, Inc, Natick, MA) and MathCad (version 15; Parametric Technologies, Natick, MA) programs and analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: The average differences in the computed durations and rates of loading are smaller than 5% between 50 and 1000 Hz sampling rates. The differences in the computed preloads and peak loads are smaller than 3%. CONCLUSIONS: The small differences observed in the characteristics of force-time profiles of simulated manual HVLA-SM thrusts measured using various sampling rates suggest that a sampling rate as low as 50 to 100 Hz may be sufficient. The results are applicable to the manipulation performed in this study: manual side posture lumbar spine HVLA-SM.
Authors: Gerrit G J M van Zoest; Henk T C M van den Berg; Fred C Holtkamp Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Christopher J Colloca; Tony S Keller; Pierre Black; Martin C Normand; Deed E Harrison; Donald D Harrison Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Maruti Ram Gudavalli; Robert D Vining; Stacie A Salsbury; Lance G Corber; Cynthia R Long; Avinash G Patwardhan; Christine M Goertz Journal: Spine J Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Lindsay M Gorrell; Gregor Kuntze; Janet L Ronsky; Ryan Carter; Bruce Symons; John J Triano; Walter Herzog Journal: Chiropr Man Therap Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Marie-Andrée Mercier; Philippe Rousseau; Martha Funabashi; Martin Descarreaux; Isabelle Pagé Journal: Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Date: 2021-10-29
Authors: Ting Xia; Cynthia R Long; Maruti R Gudavalli; David G Wilder; Robert D Vining; Robert M Rowell; William R Reed; James W DeVocht; Christine M Goertz; Edward F Owens; William C Meeker Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: Ting Xia; David G Wilder; Maruti R Gudavalli; James W DeVocht; Robert D Vining; Katherine A Pohlman; Gregory N Kawchuk; Cynthia R Long; Christine M Goertz Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 3.659