Literature DB >> 2146356

Experimental measurement of the force exerted during spinal manipulation using the Thompson technique.

B W Hessell1, W Herzog, P J Conway, M C McEwen.   

Abstract

The purpose for conducting this study was to quantify the forces exerted by a chiropractor on a patient during spinal manipulative therapy. Six patients received three treatments each from two chiropractors for a sacroiliac joint fixation. The Thompson technique was used to treat the patients. The force characteristics of the spinal manipulation were analyzed with respect to the following five points: preloading force, peak force, duration of manipulation, impulse of manipulation and point of application of the peak force. The results obtained indicated that all treatments have certain common characteristics; for example, a preload force is always followed by a large thrusting force. The values for the preload force, peak force, duration and impulse were found to have large standard deviations for a given adjuster and between patients. The location of the point of application of the peak force relative to a low back reference system appeared to be very consistent. However, it was not on the posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS) as expected, but always slightly medial to this point. This is the first study to report force results which were measured directly during spinal manipulative therapy in a clinical situation. In further studies, the results of this investigation will be compared to results obtained from a large population of patients and chiropractic adjusters. Differences in the force characteristics between chiropractors will be compared to clinical and objective measures of the rehabilitation process of the patients in order to find an "optimal" way of performing spinal manipulative therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2146356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  23 in total

1.  Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Michael A K Liebschner; Joshua W Little; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Response of lumbar paraspinal muscles spindles is greater to spinal manipulative loading compared with slower loading under length control.

Authors:  Joel G Pickar; Paul S Sung; Yu-Ming Kang; Weiqing Ge
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Neural responses to the mechanical characteristics of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation: Effect of specific contact site.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-03-27

4.  Changes in H-reflex and V-waves following spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Imran Khan Niazi; Kemal S Türker; Stanley Flavel; Mat Kinget; Jens Duehr; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Real-time force feedback during flexion-distraction procedure for low back pain: A pilot study.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; James M Cox
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

6.  Effect of spinal manipulation thrust magnitude on trunk mechanical activation thresholds of lateral thalamic neurons.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Intervertebral Fixation and Segmental Thrust Level During Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Effects of thrust amplitude and duration of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation on lumbar muscle spindle responses to vertebral position and movement.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Optimized prediction of contact force application during side-lying lumbar manipulation.

Authors:  Casey A Myers; Brian A Enebo; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.