Literature DB >> 14739874

The forces applied by female and male chiropractors during thoracic spinal manipulation.

D Forand1, J Drover, Z Suleman, B Symons, Walter Herzog.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On average, women weigh less, have a smaller frame, and are less muscular than men. Since the peak thrust force applied during spinal manipulative treatments can be quite high and must be reached in a very short period of time, one might question the physical ability of women to generate such high forces.
OBJECTIVE: To study the forces generated by male and female chiropractors as they deliver spinal manipulation to the thoracic spine.
METHODS: Fourteen male and 14 female experience-matched chiropractors participated in this study. They each manipulated 1 of 9 asymptomatic male adult subjects of similar height and weight. The clinicians were asked to manipulate a transverse process in the vicinity of T4 and T9. Any technique could be used as long as the treatment thrust was in a posterior to anterior direction and the hand contact fit onto the sensor pad (area = 100 cm2).
RESULTS: There were no significant differences (P<.05) between male and female chiropractors for any measurements in the upper thoracic area. For the lower thoracic manipulations, the preload forces for the male chiropractors were significantly greater (P<.05) than those for the female chiropractors. The remaining variables were the same between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Female chiropractors produce, from a mechanical point of view, similar manual treatments as their male colleagues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14739874     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  14 in total

1.  Establishing force and speed training targets for lumbar spine high-velocity, low-amplitude chiropractic adjustments.

Authors:  Edward F Owens; Ronald S Hosek; Stephanie G B Sullivan; Brent S Russell; Linda E Mullin; Lydia L Dever
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2015-11-24

2.  Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Michael A K Liebschner; Joshua W Little; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Learning spinal manipulation: a comparison of two teaching models.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Harvey; Shari Wynd; Lance Richardson; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2011

4.  Real-time force feedback during flexion-distraction procedure for low back pain: A pilot study.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; James M Cox
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

5.  Effect of sampling rates on the quantification of forces, durations, and rates of loading of simulated side posture high-velocity, low-amplitude lumbar spine manipulation.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; James DeVocht; Ali Tayh; Ting Xia
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Optimized prediction of contact force application during side-lying lumbar manipulation.

Authors:  Casey A Myers; Brian A Enebo; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Kinetic analysis of expertise in spinal manipulative therapy using an instrumented manikin.

Authors:  Martin Descarreaux; Claude Dugas; Jean Raymond; Martin C Normand
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2005

8.  Changes in adjustment force, speed, and direction factors in chiropractic students after 10 weeks undergoing standard technique training.

Authors:  Edward F Owens; Brent S Russell; Ronald S Hosek; Stephanie G B Sullivan; Lydia L Dever; Linda Mullin
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2017-08-02

9.  Tissue loading created during spinal manipulation in comparison to loading created by passive spinal movements.

Authors:  Martha Funabashi; Gregory N Kawchuk; Albert H Vette; Peter Goldsmith; Narasimha Prasad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on spinal range of motion: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Mario Millan; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Brian Budgell; Martin Descarreaux; Michel-Ange Amorim
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.