Literature DB >> 23789668

Effective dose assessment for participants in the National Lung Screening Trial undergoing posteroanterior chest radiographic examinations.

Randell Kruger1, Michael J Flynn, Phillip F Judy, Christopher H Cagnon, J Anthony Seibert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) is a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing low-dose helical CT with chest radiography in the screening of older current and former heavy smokers for early detection of lung cancer. Recruitment was launched in September 2002 and ended in April 2004, when 53,454 participants had been randomized at 33 screening sites. The objective of this study was to determine the effective radiation dose associated with individual chest radiographic screening examinations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 73,733 chest radiographic examinations were performed with 92 chest imaging systems. The entrance skin air kerma (ESAK) of participants' chest radiographic examinations was estimated and used in this analysis. The effective dose per ESAK for each examination was determined with a Monte Carlo-based program. The examination effective dose was calculated as the product of the examination ESAK and the Monte Carlo estimate of the ratio of effective dose per ESAK.
RESULTS: This study showed that the mean effective dose assessed from 66,157 postero-anterior chest examinations was 0.052 mSv. Additional findings were a median effective dose of 0.038 mSv, a 95th percentile value of 0.136 mSv, and a fifth percentile value of 0.013 mSv.
CONCLUSION: The effective dose for participant NLST chest radiographic examinations was determined and is of specific interest in relation to that associated with the previously published NLST low-dose CT examinations conducted during the trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23789668      PMCID: PMC3743238          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  17 in total

1.  Dosimetric aspects of a national survey of diagnostic and interventional radiology in Switzerland.

Authors:  A Aroua; I Decka; B Burnand; J P Vader; J F Valley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Frederick J Larke; Randell L Kruger; Christopher H Cagnon; Michael J Flynn; Michael M McNitt-Gray; Xizeng Wu; Phillip F Judy; Dianna D Cody
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

5.  Appendix f: pcxmc--a pc-based monte carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations.

Authors: 
Journal:  J ICRU       Date:  2005-12

6.  Experimental evaluation of PCXMC and prepare codes used in conventional radiology.

Authors:  N Khelassi-Toutaoui; Y Berkani; V Tsapaki; A E K Toutaoui; A Merad; A Frahi-Amroun; Z Brahimi
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board.

Authors:  B F Wall; D Hart
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Normalized CT dose index of the CT scanners used in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Dianna D Cody; Hyun-Jung Kim; Christopher H Cagnon; Frederick J Larke; Michael M McNitt-Gray; Randell L Kruger; Michael J Flynn; J Anthony Seibert; Philip F Judy; Xizeng Wu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  A consensus statement of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: screening for lung cancer with helical computed tomography.

Authors:  D R Aberle; G Gamsu; C I Henschke; D P Naidich; S J Swensen
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Low-dose lung computed tomography screening before age 55: estimates of the mortality reduction required to outweigh the radiation-induced cancer risk.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Kwang Pyo Kim; Christine D Berg
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.136

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.

Authors:  Asha Bonney; Reem Malouf; Corynne Marchal; David Manners; Kwun M Fong; Henry M Marshall; Louis B Irving; Renée Manser
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-03

2.  Performance of an AI based CAD system in solid lung nodule detection on chest phantom radiographs compared to radiology residents and fellow radiologists.

Authors:  Alan A Peters; Amanda Decasper; Jaro Munz; Jeremias Klaus; Laura I Loebelenz; Maximilian Korbinian Michael Hoffner; Cynthia Hourscht; Johannes T Heverhagen; Andreas Christe; Lukas Ebner
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.005

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.