Literature DB >> 22021510

Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Frederick J Larke1, Randell L Kruger, Christopher H Cagnon, Michael J Flynn, Michael M McNitt-Gray, Xizeng Wu, Phillip F Judy, Dianna D Cody.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the distribution of effective dose associated with a single low-dose CT chest examination of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. Organ doses were also investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three sites nationwide provided volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) data annually for the 97 MDCT scanners used to image 26,724 participants during the trial. The dose data were representative of the imaging protocols used by the sites for average-size participants. Effective doses were estimated first using the product of the dose-length product (CTDI(vol) × 35-cm scan length) and a published conversion factor, "k." The commercial software product CT-Expo was then used to estimate organ doses to males and females from the average CTDI(vol). Applying tissue-weighting factors from both publication 60 and the more recent publication 103 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) allowed comparisons of effective doses to males and to females.
RESULTS: The product of DLP and the k factor resulted in a mean effective dose of 1.4 mSv (SD = 0.5 mSv) for a low-dose chest examination across all scanners. The CT-Expo results based on ICRP 60 tissue-weighting factors yielded effective doses of 1.6 and 2.1 mSv for males and females, respectively, whereas CT-Expo results based on ICRP 103 tissue-weighting factors resulted in effective doses of 1.6 and 2.4 mSv, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Acceptable chest CT screening can be accomplished at an overall average effective dose of approximately 2 mSv as compared with an average effective dose of 7 mSv for a typical standard-dose chest CT examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22021510     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  53 in total

1.  Dose estimation of ultra-low-dose chest CT to different sized adult patients.

Authors:  Tony M Svahn; Tommy Sjöberg; Jennifer C Ast
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Effective dose and organ doses estimation taking tube current modulation into account with a commercial software package.

Authors:  X Lopez-Rendon; H Bosmans; R Oyen; F Zanca
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of digital tomosynthesis and computed tomography for lung nodule detection in SOS screening program.

Authors:  Maurizio Grosso; Roberto Priotto; Donatella Ghirardo; Alberto Talenti; Emanuele Roberto; Luca Bertolaccini; Alberto Terzi; Stéphane Chauvie
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Lung cancer screening with ultra-low dose CT using full iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Masayo Fujita; Toru Higaki; Yoshikazu Awaya; Toshio Nakanishi; Yuko Nakamura; Fuminari Tatsugami; Yasutaka Baba; Makoto Iida; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  A semi-automated volumetric software for segmentation and perfusion parameter quantification of brain tumors using 320-row multidetector computed tomography: a validation study.

Authors:  Soo Young Chae; Sangil Suh; Inseon Ryoo; Arim Park; Kyoung Jin Noh; Hackjoon Shim; Hae Young Seol
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  Implementation and organization of lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Jesper Holst Pedersen; Haseem Ashraf
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

Review 7.  Imaging-based screening: understanding the controversies.

Authors:  Diana L Lam; Pari V Pandharipande; Janie M Lee; Constance D Lehman; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Low Dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening: The Background, the Guidelines, and a Tailored Approach to Patient Care.

Authors:  Emily Tylski; Mala Goyal
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

9.  Lung Cancer Screening Using Low Dose CT Scanning in Germany. Extrapolation of results from the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Martin Schuler; Bernd Kowall; Kaid Darwiche; Hilmar Kühl; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 10.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Antonio Gutierrez; Robert Suh; Fereidoun Abtin; Scott Genshaft; Kathleen Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.