Literature DB >> 23780520

Perceptual processing of natural scenes at rapid rates: effects of complexity, content, and emotional arousal.

Andreas Löw1, Margaret M Bradley, Peter J Lang.   

Abstract

During rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), the perceptual system is confronted with a rapidly changing array of sensory information demanding resolution. At rapid rates of presentation, previous studies have found an early (e.g., 150-280 ms) negativity over occipital sensors that is enhanced when emotional, as compared with neutral, pictures are viewed, suggesting facilitated perception. In the present study, we explored how picture composition and the presence of people in the image affect perceptual processing of pictures of natural scenes. Using RSVP, pictures that differed in perceptual composition (figure-ground or scenes), content (presence of people or not), and emotional content (emotionally arousing or neutral) were presented in a continuous stream for 330 ms each with no intertrial interval. In both subject and picture analyses, all three variables affected the amplitude of occipital negativity, with the greatest enhancement for figure-ground compositions (as compared with scenes), irrespective of content and emotional arousal, supporting an interpretation that ease of perceptual processing is associated with enhanced occipital negativity. Viewing emotional pictures prompted enhanced negativity only for pictures that depicted people, suggesting that specific features of emotionally arousing images are associated with facilitated perceptual processing, rather than all emotional content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23780520      PMCID: PMC3865176          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0179-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  28 in total

1.  Fleeting images: a new look at early emotion discrimination.

Authors:  M Junghöfer; M M Bradley; T R Elbert; P J Lang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies.

Authors:  Nicole Ille; Patrick Berg; Michael Scherg
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  With a careful look: still no low-level confound to face pop-out.

Authors:  Orit Hershler; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Measurement of ERP latency differences: a comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods.

Authors:  Andrea Kiesel; Jeff Miller; Pierre Jolicoeur; Benoit Brisson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Emotion processing in the visual brain: a MEG analysis.

Authors:  Peter Peyk; Harald T Schupp; Thomas Elbert; Markus Junghöfer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 6.  Topographic ERP analyses: a step-by-step tutorial review.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Denis Brunet; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Memory and event-related potentials for rapidly presented emotional pictures.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; Margaret M Bradley; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Beyond good and evil: the time-course of neural activity elicited by specific picture content.

Authors:  Anna Weinberg; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-12

9.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

10.  Impaired response selection in schizophrenia: evidence from the P3 wave and the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Emily S Kappenman; Rebecca L Fuller; Benjamin Robinson; Ann Summerfelt; James M Gold
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  Brain dynamics of visual attention during anticipation and encoding of threat- and safe-cues in spider-phobic individuals.

Authors:  Jaroslaw M Michalowski; Christiane A Pané-Farré; Andreas Löw; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Effects of attention manipulations on motivated attention to feared and nonfeared negative distracters in spider fear.

Authors:  Joakim Norberg; Stefan Wiens
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.288

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.