Literature DB >> 17995913

Measurement of ERP latency differences: a comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods.

Andrea Kiesel1, Jeff Miller, Pierre Jolicoeur, Benoit Brisson.   

Abstract

We used computer simulations to evaluate different procedures for measuring changes in the onset latency of a representative range of event-related components (the auditory and visual N1, P3, N2pc, and the frequency-related P3 difference wave). These procedures included several techniques to determine onset latencies combined with approaches using both single-participant average waveforms and jackknife-subsample average waveforms. In general, the jackknife-based approach combined with the relative criterion technique or combined with the fractional area technique (J.C. Hansen & S.A. Hillyard, 1980; S.J. Luck, 2005) provided the most accurate method and the greatest statistical power, with no inflation of Type I error rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17995913     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00618.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  90 in total

Review 1.  A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Attentional and anatomical considerations for the representation of simple stimuli in visual short-term memory: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Rosalie Perron; Christine Lefebvre; Nicolas Robitaille; Benoit Brisson; Frédéric Gosselin; Martin Arguin; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-02-18

3.  Neurodynamic correlates of response inhibition from emerging to mid adulthood.

Authors:  Martina Knežević; Ksenija Marinković
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2017-03-21

4.  Feature selection in the human brain: electrophysiological correlates of sensory enhancement and feature integration.

Authors:  Andreas Keil; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; Gregory J Christie; David J Prime; Pierre Jolicœur; John J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Electrophysiological evidence for age effects on sensory memory processing of tonal patterns.

Authors:  Johanna Rimmele; Elyse Sussman; Christian Keitel; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-08-08

7.  To the beat of your own drum: cortical regularization of non-integer ratio rhythms toward metrical patterns.

Authors:  Benjamin A Motz; Molly A Erickson; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

9.  Attention-modulated alpha-band oscillations protect against intrusion of irrelevant information.

Authors:  Lisa Payne; Sylvia Guillory; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Visual search elicits the electrophysiological marker of visual working memory.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Jay Pratt; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.