Literature DB >> 6155251

Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

D Lehmann, W Skrandies.   

Abstract

A method is proposed to determine components of evoked scalp potentials, in terms of times of occurrence (latency) and location on the scalp (topography). The scalp field distributions were evoked by checkerboard reversal and were recorded simultaneously in 47 channels. Component latencies are defined as times of maximal values of the electrical power of the evoked field (a measure of the amount of field relief); this measurement is independent of the choice of the reference electrode. In 10 subjects, two evoked components were found consistently: at 100 and at 140 msec. Plots of scalp locations of the extreme field values (i.e., reference-free data) at the occurrence times of the components showed occipitally positive and anteriorly negative extreme values at 100 msec, and vice versa at 140 msec. The occipital extreme values were surrounded by steep field gradients suggesting occipital generator processes. The polarity reversal of the evoked field distributions between 100 and 140 msec was a quick, jump-like location change of the extreme values in the field. The locations of the extreme field values were stable for long periods around peak times of the power curve. During these periods, the shape of the field remained constant (assessed by the average standard deviation of voltages per electrode between successive field distributions), suggesting also a stable localization of the generating process in depth. The field distributions tended to be concentric around the extreme field values. The major characteristics of the observed scalp fields showed no wave fronts, and no continuous 'traveling' of extreme values over larger distances.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6155251     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90419-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  349 in total

1.  Gamma and beta frequency oscillations in response to novel auditory stimuli: A comparison of human electroencephalogram (EEG) data with in vitro models.

Authors:  C Haenschel; T Baldeweg; R J Croft; M Whittington; J Gruzelier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The effect of stimulus intensity on brain responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Soile Komssi; Seppo Kähkönen; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Visual recognition of faces, objects, and words using degraded stimuli: where and when it occurs.

Authors:  Alan J Pegna; Asaid Khateb; Christoph M Michel; Theodor Landis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Setting boundaries: brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Deirdre M Foxe; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effects of social context and predictive relevance on action outcome monitoring.

Authors:  Leonie Koban; Gilles Pourtois; Benoit Bediou; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Knowledge scale effects in face recognition: an electrophysiological investigation.

Authors:  Rasha Abdel Rahman; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Isolating early cortical generators of visual-evoked activity: a systems identification approach.

Authors:  Jeremy W Murphy; Simon P Kelly; John J Foxe; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neural time course of visually enhanced echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  EEG during pedaling: evidence for cortical control of locomotor tasks.

Authors:  Sanket Jain; Krishnaj Gourab; Sheila Schindler-Ivens; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Normative topographic ERP analyses of speed of speech processing and grammar before and after grammatical treatment.

Authors:  Paul J Yoder; Dennis Molfese; Micah M Murray; Alexandra P F Key
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.