Literature DB >> 16698058

With a careful look: still no low-level confound to face pop-out.

Orit Hershler1, Shaul Hochstein.   

Abstract

In this issue of Vision Research, VanRullen, R. (2006). On second glance: Still no high-level pop-out effect for faces. Vision Research, in press. challenges our earlier Vision Research paper, "At first sight: A high-level pop-out effect for faces" (Hershler, O., & Hochstein, S. (2005). At first sight: A high-level pop-out effect for faces. Vision Research, 45, 1707-1724). In that paper, we showed that faces pop-out from a great variety of heterogeneous distractors. This search must have been based on a holistic combination of facial features, since it could not have relied on any single low-level distinguishing feature-each of which was present in at least some of the distractors. VanRullen implies that the pop-out effect is not limited to faces, is not holistic, and is due to a low-level confound, namely that the "low-level" Fourier amplitude spectrum may differentiate between faces and other categories. We now show that he fails to substantiate all three claims. His first experiment replicates our own and shows once again that faces do indeed pop-out, while other objects, such as cars, do not. The claim regarding the non-holistic nature of face search is based on a failure to differentiate between holistic processing for face detection and for individual face identification. His central claim is that the Fourier amplitude spectrum is processed low-level and could be used for face pop-out. However, changing the amplitude spectrum may well affect high-level representations as well. For example, his demonstration uses hybrid images which are extremely fuzzy, rendering them difficult to identify. More importantly, this claim would lead to the conclusion that targets with a non-face phase spectrum and only a face amplitude spectrum would pop-out among distractors with different amplitude spectra. We demonstrate that this is, of course, not the case and that the Fourier amplitude is not the hoped for "low-level confound". Until another such "hidden" low level feature is found, we must accept that face pop out depends on a high level mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16698058     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  21 in total

1.  Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; George A Alvarez; Ruth Rosenholtz; Yoana I Kuzmova; Ashley M Sherman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Finding faces among faces: human faces are located more quickly and accurately than other primate and mammal faces.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Simpson; Zachary Buchin; Katie Werner; Rey Worrell; Krisztina V Jakobsen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Fur in the midst of the waters: visual search for material type is inefficient.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Loretta Myers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The wide window of face detection.

Authors:  Orit Hershler; Tal Golan; Shlomo Bentin; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects.

Authors:  Robert T Keys; Jessica Taubert; Susan G Wardle
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Major issues in the study of visual search: Part 2 of "40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman".

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Local feature suppression effect in face and non-face stimuli.

Authors:  Artyom Zinchenko; Hyojung Kim; Adrian Danek; Hermann J Müller; Dragan Rangelov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-01

8.  Visual search efficiency is greater for human faces compared to animal faces.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Simpson; Haley L Husband; Krysten Yee; Alison Fullerton; Krisztina V Jakobsen
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2014

9.  Face Detection and the Development of Own-Species Bias in Infant Macaques.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Simpson; Krisztina V Jakobsen; Fabrice Damon; Stephen J Suomi; Pier F Ferrari; Annika Paukner
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2016-05-25

10.  Perceptual processing of natural scenes at rapid rates: effects of complexity, content, and emotional arousal.

Authors:  Andreas Löw; Margaret M Bradley; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.