Literature DB >> 11205644

Endoscopic management of bile duct stones.

K F Binmoeller1, T W Schafer.   

Abstract

The advantages of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) over open surgery make it the predominant method of treating choledocholithiasis. Today, technologic advances such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic surgery are challenging ERCP's primacy in the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones. This article reviews the current status of endoscopic treatment of biliary stones and examines this in relation to laparoscopic management. The techniques and safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon sphincteroplasty are reviewed. Balloon sphincteroplasty should be limited to study protocols because of safety questions and inherent limitations. After sphincterotomy, 85% to 90% of CBD stones can be removed with a Dormia basket or balloon catheter. These techniques are described as having both advantages and disadvantages. Methods for managing "difficult stones" include mechanical lithotripsy, intraductal shock wave lithotripsy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, chemical dissolution, and biliary stenting. These approaches are presented along with data supporting their use in specific situations. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has emerged as the preferred alternative to open cholecystectomy. Parallel advances in the endoscopic and laparoscopic management of CBD stones have made the issue regarding the optimal treatment strategy complex. Three approaches to the management of choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era are presented as follows: strict therapeutic splitting, flexible therapeutic splitting, and strict laparoscopic management. The optimal approach needs to be defined in prospective comparative trials. For now, preoperative endoscopic stone extraction should still be recommended as the approach of choice in patients suspected to have CBD stones based on clinical, biochemical, and imaging parameters. Primary laparoscopic evaluation and management is reasonable in patients who have a low-to-moderate probability of having CBD stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11205644     DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200102000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  32 in total

1.  Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience.

Authors:  L Enochsson; B Lindberg; F Swahn; U Arnelo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Xiangsong Wu; Yong Yang; Ping Dong; Jun Gu; Jianhua Lu; Maolan Li; Jiasheng Mu; Wenguang Wu; Jiahua Yang; Lin Zhang; Qichen Ding; Yingbin Liu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  [Therapeutic splitting as standard treatment for cholelithiasis].

Authors:  U T Hopt; U Adam
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Management of common bile duct stones: controversies and future perspectives.

Authors:  Eduardo M Targarona; Gali Even Bendahan
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Nonsurgical management of an impacted mechanical lithotriptor with fractured traction wires: endoscopic intracorporeal electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy followed by extra-endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy.

Authors:  Tan Attila; Gary R May; Paul Kortan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Failure of sequential biliary stenting for unsuccessful common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Varayu Prachayakul; Pitulak Aswakul
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-06-16

7.  Endoscopic removal of a bile-duct stone using sphincterotomy and a large-balloon dilator in a patient with situs inversus totalis.

Authors:  Jin Ho Lee; Dae Hwan Kang; Jong Hwan Park; Min Dae Kim; Ki Tae Yoon; Cheol Woong Choi; Hyung Wook Kim; Mong Cho
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.519

8.  Prognostic Factors and Postoperative Recurrence of Calculus Following Small-Incision Sphincterotomy with Papillary Balloon Dilation for the Treatment of Intractable Choledocholithiasis: A 72-Month Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Hailian Mu; Jianfei Gao; Qingyin Kong; Kaitong Jiang; Cuiyue Wang; Aihua Wang; Xianzhong Zeng; Yanqing Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hironobu Onishi; Masaji Tani; Hiroyuki Kinoshita; Manabu Kawai; Masaki Ueno; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Difficult bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lee McHenry; Glen Lehman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.