Literature DB >> 19568225

Effect of biliary stenting combined with ursodeoxycholic acid and terpene treatment on retained common bile duct stones in elderly patients: a multicenter study.

Jimin Han1, Jong Ho Moon, Hyun Cheol Koo, Jee Heon Kang, Joon Hyuck Choi, Seok Jeong, Don Haeng Lee, Moon Sung Lee, Ho Gak Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: For frail, elderly patients with large impacted common bile duct (CBD) stones, long-term treatment with biliary stenting provides palliation. Biliary stenting with choleretic agents such as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and terpene preparations may promote CBD stone size reduction. We studied the effectiveness of biliary stenting combined with UDCA and a terpene preparation as a medical treatment for difficult-to-remove CBD stones in patients older than 65 years in this multicenter, prospective study.
METHODS: A total of 28 elderly patients with CBD stones refractory to conventional endoscopic removal, including mechanical lithotripsy, underwent endoscopic placement of a straight 10-F plastic biliary stent. Each patient was administered 600 mg of UDCA and 300 mg of a terpene preparation daily for a mean of 6 months. After 6 months of medication following the initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a second ERCP was performed and endoscopic stone removal was again attempted. Differences in stone size and CBD diameter before and after biliary stenting and medication were compared. The complete stone removal rate after treatment was obtained.
RESULTS: The mean size (transverse x longitudinal diameter) of the CBD stones was initially 21.6 x 29.5 mm, and it decreased significantly to 12.2 x 20.1 mm at the second ERCP (P<0.01). The mean CBD diameter measured initially at the cystic duct insertion level was 23.2 mm, and it decreased significantly to 19.5 mm at the second ERCP (P<0.01). After biliary stenting with medication, endoscopic stone removal was successful in 26 of 28 patients (92.8%), with a mean of 1.7 subsequent ERCP sessions.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic biliary stenting with a period of combined UDCA and terpene preparation administration seems to be a safe and effective method for retained CBD stones in elderly patients. A prospective study with randomization and a control group is required to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19568225     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  16 in total

1.  Failure of sequential biliary stenting for unsuccessful common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Varayu Prachayakul; Pitulak Aswakul
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-06-16

2.  Do not rush for surgery; stent placement may be an effective step for definitive treatment of initially unextractable common bile duct stones with ERCP.

Authors:  Wafi Attaallah; Asim Cingi; Sakir Karpuz; Mehmet Karakus; Omer Gunal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Guru Trikudanathan; Udayakumar Navaneethan; Mansour A Parsi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Effects of Rowachol on prevention of postcholecystectomy pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  In Woong Han; O Choel Kwon; Min Gu Oh; Yoo Shin Choi; Seung Eun Lee
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  The Stent Patency and Migration Rate of Different Shaped Plastic Stents in Bile Flow Phantom Model and In Vivo Animal Bile Duct Dilation Model.

Authors:  Chang-Il Kwon; Gwangil Kim; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Kyoung Ah Kim; Kwang Hyun Ko; Joo Young Cho; Sung Pyo Hong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Endoscopic biliary stenting in irretrievable common bile duct stones: stent exchange or expectant management-tertiary-centre experience and systematic review.

Authors:  Noor Mohammed; Matthew Pinder; Keith Harris; Simon M Everett
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-22

7.  Long-term effects of forgotten biliary stents: a case series and literature review.

Authors:  Mehmet Odabasi; Cem Arslan; Sami Akbulut; Haci Hasan Abuoglu; Erkan Ozkan; Mehmet Kamil Yildiz; Cengiz Eris; Emre Gunay; Kemal Tekesin; Tolga Muftuoglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08-15

8.  Oldest biliary endoprosthesis in situ.

Authors:  Pierluigi Consolo; Giuseppe Scalisi; Stefano F Crinò; Andrea Tortora; Giuseppa Giacobbe; Marcello Cintolo; Luigi Familiari; Socrate Pallio
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-07-16

Review 9.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Impact of biliary stent-related events in patients diagnosed with advanced pancreatobiliary tumours receiving palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Angela Lamarca; Christina Rigby; Mairéad G McNamara; Richard A Hubner; Juan W Valle
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.