Literature DB >> 23771600

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma.

T De Coninck1, L Jans, G Sys, W Huysse, T Verstraeten, R Forsyth, B Poffyn, K Verstraete.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate benign from malignant cartilage tumours compared to standard MRI. To investigate whether a cutoff value could be determined to differentiate enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma (CS) more accurately.
METHODS: One hundred six patients were included in this retrospective study: 75 with enchondromas (mean age = 41 years) and 31 with CS (mean age = 47 years). Within this population, a subgroup of patients was selected with the tumour arising in a long bone. At the time of diagnosis, the tumours were evaluated on MRI, including standard MRI, DCE-MRI, and region-of-interest (ROI) analysis to obtain information on tumour vascularisation and perfusion.
RESULTS: The main cutoff value to differentiate enchondroma from CS contained a two-fold more relative enhancement compared with muscle, combined with a 4.5 (= 76°) slope value, with 100 % sensitivity and 63.3 % specificity. The prediction of CS diagnosis with DCE-MRI had 93.4 % accuracy. The accuracy of the standard MRI parameters was equal to the DCE-MRI parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Standard MRI and DCE-MRI both play an important and complementary role in differentiating enchondroma from low-grade CS. A combination of both imaging techniques leads to the highest diagnostic accuracy for differentiating cartilaginous tumours. KEY POINTS: • DCE-MRI plays an important role in differentiating benign from malignant cartilage tumours. • Retrospective study defined a threshold for 100 % detection of chondrosarcoma with DCE-MRI. • The threshold values were relative enhancement = 2 and slope = 4.5. • One hundred per cent chondrosarcoma detection corresponds with 36.7 % false-positive diagnosis of enchondroma. • Standard MRI is complementary to DCE-MRI in differentiating cartilaginous tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23771600     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2913-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  24 in total

1.  Dedifferentiated clear cell chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  R K Kalil; C Y Inwards; K K Unni; F Bertoni; P Bacchini; D E Wenger; F H Sim
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: basic principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  K L Verstraete; H J Van der Woude; P C Hogendoorn; Y De-Deene; M Kunnen; J L Bloem
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  The imaging of cartilaginous bone tumours. I. Benign lesions.

Authors:  H Douis; A Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions: value of cross-sectional imaging.

Authors:  Klaus Woertler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: is it useful or necessary?

Authors:  L H De Beuckeleer; A M De Schepper; F Ramon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Radiographic differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma in the fibula.

Authors:  Scott D Kendell; Mark S Collins; Mark C Adkins; Murali Sundaram; Krishnan K Unni
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features.

Authors:  M D Murphey; D J Flemming; S R Boyea; J A Bojescul; D E Sweet; H T Temple
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  Hans Gelderblom; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Sander D Dijkstra; Carla S van Rijswijk; Augustinus D Krol; Antonie H M Taminiau; Judith V M G Bovée
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-03

10.  Enchondroma versus Low-Grade Chondrosarcoma in Appendicular Skeleton: Clinical and Radiological Criteria.

Authors:  Eugenio M Ferrer-Santacreu; Eduardo J Ortiz-Cruz; José Manuel González-López; Elia Pérez Fernández
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.375

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  CORR ® Tumor Board: Do Orthopaedic Oncologists Agree on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cartilage Tumors of the Appendicular Skeleton?

Authors:  Megan E Anderson; Jim S Wu; Sara O Vargas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Study of proximal femoral bone perfusion with 3D T1 dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jean-François Budzik; Guillaume Lefebvre; Gerard Forzy; Mazen El Rafei; David Chechin; Anne Cotten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Perfusion Imaging Characterizes Tumor Response to Radiation Therapy in Chordoma.

Authors:  P Santos; K K Peck; J Arevalo-Perez; S Karimi; E Lis; Y Yamada; A I Holodny; J Lyo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Diagnostic value of MRI-based 3D texture analysis for tissue characterisation and discrimination of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Catharina S Lisson; Christoph G Lisson; Kerstin Flosdorf; Regine Mayer-Steinacker; Markus Schultheiss; Alexandra von Baer; Thomas F E Barth; Ambros J Beer; Matthias Baumhauer; Reinhard Meier; Meinrad Beer; Stefan A Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas?

Authors:  Hassan Douis; M Parry; S Vaiyapuri; A M Davies
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  [Cartilage tumors : Pathology and radiomorphology].

Authors:  M Uhl; G Herget; P Kurz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the assessment of spinal tumor vascularity: correlation with angiography.

Authors:  Xiao-Xi Meng; Yong-Qiu Zhang; Hua-Qiang Liao; Hong-Chao Liu; Hai-Lin Jiang; Shu-Jun Ke; Wei-Hua Dong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Benign Hand Tumors (Part I): Cartilaginous and Bone Tumors.

Authors:  Kai-Lou C Yue; Jonathan Lans; René M Castelein; David I Suster; G Petur Nielsen; Neal C Chen; Santiago A Lozano-CalderÓn
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-06

Review 9.  Update on the imaging features of the enchondromatosis syndromes.

Authors:  Ban Sharif; Daniel Lindsay; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Chondrosarcoma-from Molecular Pathology to Novel Therapies.

Authors:  Agnieszka E Zając; Sylwia Kopeć; Bartłomiej Szostakowski; Mateusz J Spałek; Michał Fiedorowicz; Elżbieta Bylina; Paulina Filipowicz; Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz; Andrzej Tysarowski; Anna M Czarnecka; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.