Literature DB >> 9747616

Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features.

M D Murphey1, D J Flemming, S R Boyea, J A Bojescul, D E Sweet, H T Temple.   

Abstract

Distinction of enchondroma versus intramedullary chondrosarcoma affecting the appendicular skeleton (proximal to the metacarpals and metatarsals) is a frequent diagnostic dilemma. The authors studied a large series of patients with these lesions (92 with enchondromas, 95 with chondrosarcomas) using statistical assessment of both clinical parameters and numerous radiologic manifestations on images from multiple modalities to identify differentiating features. Multiple clinical and imaging parameters demonstrated statistically significant differences between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma, particularly pain related to the lesion, deep endosteal scalloping (greater than two-thirds of cortical thickness), cortical destruction and soft-tissue mass (at computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), periosteal reaction (at radiography), and marked uptake of radionuclide (greater than the anterior iliac crest) at bone scintigraphy. All of these features strongly suggested the diagnosis of chondrosarcoma. These criteria allow distinction of appendicular enchondroma and chondrosarcoma in at least 90% of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9747616     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.18.5.9747616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  74 in total

Review 1.  Benign and malignant tumors of the foot and ankle.

Authors:  Adam D Singer; Abhijit Datir; Jonathan Tresley; Travis Langley; Paul D Clifford; Jean Jose; Ty K Subhawong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Bilateral multiple malignant transformation of Ollier's disease.

Authors:  N Kosaki; H Yabe; U Anazawa; H Morioka; M Mukai; Y Toyama
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-02-19       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  [Comment on the work "Therapy of enchondroma in long bones" (H. Steckel, M. Oldenburg, R.T. Müller)].

Authors:  W Mutschler; W Sienel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Nasal chondrosarcoma in an infant: radiologic and histologic correlation.

Authors:  K Taori; S Chandanshive; V Attarde; P Patil; V Rangankar; S Londhe
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Femoral mesenchymal chondrosarcoma with secondary aneurysmal bone cysts mimicking a small-cell osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Shalini A Amukotuwa; Peter F M Choong; Peter J Smith; Gerard J Powell; David Thomas; Stephen M Schlicht
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Pain and deformity of the index finger in a 41-year-old woman.

Authors:  Veronica A Diaz; Stephen E Vernon; E Anne Ouellette
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A reproducible and simple grading system for classical chondrosarcomas. Analysis of 35 chondrosarcomas and 16 enchondromas with emphasis on recurrence rate and radiological and clinical data.

Authors:  Heike Welkerling; Susanne Kratz; Volker Ewerbeck; Günter Delling
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Extended intralesional treatment versus resection of low-grade chondrosarcomas.

Authors:  Chad Aarons; Benjamin K Potter; Sheila C Adams; J David Pitcher; H Thomas Temple
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  [MRI morphology of bone tumors and tumor-like lesions].

Authors:  R Erlemann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  No recurrences in selected patients after curettage with cryotherapy for grade I chondrosarcomas.

Authors:  Badio S Souna; Nicolas Belot; Hélène Duval; Frantz Langlais; Hervé Thomazeau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.