Literature DB >> 15221215

Radiographic differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma in the fibula.

Scott D Kendell1, Mark S Collins, Mark C Adkins, Murali Sundaram, Krishnan K Unni.   

Abstract

To evaluate demographic and radiographic features that may differentiate between enchondroma and low-grade chondrosarcoma of the fibula. The radiographs of ninety-three histologically-confirmed cartilaginous tumors of the fibula were retrospectively reviewed along with demographic information as to patient age and gender. Fifty-four enchondromas and thirty-nine low-grade chondrosarcomas were included in the study. Multiple previously-established radiographic features distinguishing enchondroma from chondrosarcoma were evaluated in each fibular tumor in a consensus manner by two experienced, board-certified and fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Five radiographic features were shown to statistically favor chondrosarcoma over enchondroma in the fibula. These were soft-tissue mass ( p<0.0001), periosteal reaction ( p=0.008), cortical disruption in the juxta-articular fibula ( p=0.0133), cortical thickening ( p=0.032), and tumor size greater than 4 cm ( p=0.0046). No statistically-significant demographic differences were found between patients with enchondroma and chondrosarcoma of the fibula. When two or more of the identified features of malignancy are identified in the same patient, chondrosarcoma is 2.4 times more likely than in those patients exhibiting none of the features of malignancy. Soft-tissue mass, periosteal reaction, cortical disruption in the juxta-articular fibula, cortical thickening, and tumor size greater than 4 cm indicate chondrosarcoma over enchondroma of the fibula. Radiographs demonstrating more than one of the identified malignant features are more likely to be due to chondrosarcoma than radiographs demonstrating none or only one of the identified features. No unique malignant features of chondrosarcoma in the fibula were observed when compared to previous descriptions of these tumors in the long and short tubular bones of the appendicular skeleton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221215     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-004-0791-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  9 in total

Review 1.  Benign and malignant cartilage tumors of bone and joint: their anatomic and theoretical basis with an emphasis on radiology, pathology and clinical biology. I. The intramedullary cartilage tumors.

Authors:  E W Brien; J M Mirra; R Kerr
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Chondrosarcoma of the short tubular bones of the hands and feet.

Authors:  T G Cawte; G C Steiner; J Beltran; H D Dorfman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  M J Geirnaerdt; J Hermans; J L Bloem; H M Kroon; T L Pope; A H Taminiau; P C Hogendoorn
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Low-grade chondrosarcoma vs enchondroma: challenges in diagnosis and management.

Authors:  X L Wang; L H De Beuckeleer; A M De Schepper; E Van Marck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Chondrosarcoma of small bones of the hands and feet.

Authors:  A Ogose; K K Unni; R G Swee; G K May; C M Rowland; F H Sim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Primary chondrosarcoma of long bones and limb girdles.

Authors:  J Björnsson; R A McLeod; K K Unni; D M Ilstrup; D J Pritchard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Chondrosarcoma: correlation of radiological and histological grade.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; A L Schiller; H J Mankin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Cartilaginous bone tumors.

Authors:  M A Giudici; R P Moser; M J Kransdorf
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features.

Authors:  M D Murphey; D J Flemming; S R Boyea; J A Bojescul; D E Sweet; H T Temple
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

  9 in total
  14 in total

1.  Bilateral multiple malignant transformation of Ollier's disease.

Authors:  N Kosaki; H Yabe; U Anazawa; H Morioka; M Mukai; Y Toyama
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-02-19       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Enchondromas in children: imaging appearance with pathological correlation.

Authors:  Guillaume Bierry; Darcy A Kerr; G Petur Nielsen; Andrew E Rosenberg; Ambrose J Huang; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Diagnostic value of MRI-based 3D texture analysis for tissue characterisation and discrimination of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Catharina S Lisson; Christoph G Lisson; Kerstin Flosdorf; Regine Mayer-Steinacker; Markus Schultheiss; Alexandra von Baer; Thomas F E Barth; Ambros J Beer; Matthias Baumhauer; Reinhard Meier; Meinrad Beer; Stefan A Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  The imaging of cartilaginous bone tumours. I. Benign lesions.

Authors:  H Douis; A Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Radiographic Enchondroma Surveillance: Assessing Clinical Outcomes and Costs Effectiveness.

Authors:  Craig C Akoh; Ethan Craig; Alexander M Troester; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

6.  Cortical scalloping and cortical penetration by small eccentric chondroid lesions in the long tubular bones: not a sign of malignancy?

Authors:  Kimmie L Bui; Hakan Ilaslan; Thomas W Bauer; Steven A Lietman; Michael J Joyce; Murali Sundaram
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  T De Coninck; L Jans; G Sys; W Huysse; T Verstraeten; R Forsyth; B Poffyn; K Verstraete
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Is Needle Biopsy Clinically Useful in Preoperative Grading of Central Chondrosarcoma of the Pelvis and Long Bones?

Authors:  Pablo D Roitman; Germán L Farfalli; Miguel A Ayerza; D Luis Múscolo; Federico E Milano; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  [Benign tumours and tumour-like lesions of the bone : General treatment principles].

Authors:  H Fritzsche; K-D Schaser; C Hofbauer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Histopathologic Differentiation between Enchondroma and Well-differentiated Chondrosarcoma: Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic Histologic Structures.

Authors:  Shams Shariat Torbaghan; Mahdi Ashouri; Noushin Jalayer Naderi; Nima Baherini
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2011-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.