Literature DB >> 23771297

Tuned for the future: intentions are only accessible when a retrieval opportunity is near.

Janette C Schult1, Melanie C Steffens.   

Abstract

The intention-superiority effect describes faster reaction times for stimuli related to an intention than for more neutral material during the retention interval. Some authors have interpreted the effect in terms of a more persistent activation of intention-related material. However, typically participants are instructed to realize the intention immediately after completing the task in which reaction times are assessed (e.g., a recognition task) in order to yield the intention-superiority effect. Thus, the reaction-time task is also associated with a retrieval context. We tested whether the proximity of a retrieval opportunity affects the intention-superiority effect by manipulating whether or not a recognition task indicated a retrieval opportunity. We observed an intention-superiority effect only if the task itself was a meaningful cue for a near retrieval opportunity. This finding indicates that even short-term-delayed intentions flexibly become more or less accessible, depending on the proximity of a retrieval opportunity. We further demonstrated that the intention-superiority effect is not restricted to motor tasks, but is also found for monitoring tasks when the task realization has personally relevant consequences (replicating Schult & Steffens, Memory & Cognition, 39, 1487-1495, 2011).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23771297     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0337-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

1.  The activation of unrelated and canceled intentions.

Authors:  R L Marsh; J L Hicks; E S Bryan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

2.  Prospective memory: a new focus for research.

Authors:  P Graf; B Uttl
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2001-12

3.  The representation of delayed intentions: a prospective subject-performed task?

Authors:  Jayne E Freeman; Judi A Ellis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Melissa J Guynn; Gilles O Einstein; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm.

Authors:  Moritz Walser; Rico Fischer; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Encoding information for future action: memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks.

Authors:  A Koriat; H Ben-Zur; A Nussbaum
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-11

8.  Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Gabriel I Cook
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

9.  On the representation of intentions: do personally relevant consequences determine activation?

Authors:  Janette C Schult; Melanie C Steffens
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

10.  Forming and canceling everyday intentions: implications for prospective remembering.

Authors:  P M Dockree; J A Ellis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  The effects of enactment and intention accessibility on prospective memory performance.

Authors:  Janette C Schult; Melanie C Steffens
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

2.  The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill Talley Shelton
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Memory Recall After "Learning by Doing" and "Learning by Viewing": Boundary Conditions of an Enactment Benefit.

Authors:  Melanie C Steffens; Rul von Stülpnagel; Janette C Schult
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.