Niccolò M Passoni1, Nazareno Suardi1, Firas Abdollah1, Maria Picchio2, Giampiero Giovacchini2, Cristina Messa3, Massimo Freschi4, Francesco Montorsi1, Alberto Briganti5. 1. Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vita Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. 3. Center for Molecular Bioimaging, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy. 4. Department of Pathology, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. 5. Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: briganti.alberto@hsr.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be a valid tool in detecting lymph node (LN) metastases in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We assessed its validity in detecting a single positive LN at pathologic examination in regard to an increasing interest in lesion-targeted salvage therapies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 46 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and a single positive spot at [(11)C]choline PET/CT who underwent pelvic or pelvic and retroperitoneal LN dissection. The ability of [(11)C]choline PET/CT in identifying the exact positive LN was assessed with the positive predictive value (PPV) in the overall population and according to androgen deprivation therapy, prostate-specific antigen value, and site of PET/CT positivity. RESULTS: Overall, 30 patients (65%) had positive LNs at pathologic examination. Of these, only 16 (35%) had pathologically confirmed metastases in the same lymphatic region and 11 (24%) had involvement of 1 single LN. Conversely, 28 patients had positive LNs in other areas and 8 had no evidence of metastases. The overall PPV of PET/CT was 34.8% and 23.9% when exact concordance was defined according to the lymphatic landing site and single positive LN, respectively. The PPV ranged from 33.3% to 44.4% and from 17.9% to 28.6%, in men with and without androgen deprivation therapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PPV [(11)C]choline of PET/CT in correctly identifying patients with a single positive LN at salvage LN dissection is poor (24%). Therefore, extensive salvage treatment approaches are needed to maximize the chance of cure.
OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be a valid tool in detecting lymph node (LN) metastases in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We assessed its validity in detecting a single positive LN at pathologic examination in regard to an increasing interest in lesion-targeted salvage therapies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 46 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and a single positive spot at [(11)C]choline PET/CT who underwent pelvic or pelvic and retroperitoneal LN dissection. The ability of [(11)C]choline PET/CT in identifying the exact positive LN was assessed with the positive predictive value (PPV) in the overall population and according to androgen deprivation therapy, prostate-specific antigen value, and site of PET/CT positivity. RESULTS: Overall, 30 patients (65%) had positive LNs at pathologic examination. Of these, only 16 (35%) had pathologically confirmed metastases in the same lymphatic region and 11 (24%) had involvement of 1 single LN. Conversely, 28 patients had positive LNs in other areas and 8 had no evidence of metastases. The overall PPV of PET/CT was 34.8% and 23.9% when exact concordance was defined according to the lymphatic landing site and single positive LN, respectively. The PPV ranged from 33.3% to 44.4% and from 17.9% to 28.6%, in men with and without androgen deprivation therapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PPV [(11)C]choline of PET/CT in correctly identifying patients with a single positive LN at salvage LN dissection is poor (24%). Therefore, extensive salvage treatment approaches are needed to maximize the chance of cure.
Authors: Lars J Petersen; Julie B Nielsen; Katja Dettmann; Rune V Fisker; Uwe Haberkorn; Louise Stenholt; Helle D Zacho Journal: Mol Clin Oncol Date: 2017-05-31
Authors: Andrei Fodor; Andrea Lancia; Francesco Ceci; Maria Picchio; Morten Hoyer; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Piet Ost; Paolo Castellucci; Elena Incerti; Nadia Di Muzio; Gianluca Ingrosso Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: M Picchio; G Berardi; A Fodor; E Busnardo; C Crivellaro; G Giovacchini; C Fiorino; M Kirienko; E Incerti; C Messa; L Gianolli; N Di Muzio Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 9.236