Alexis Lépinoy1, Yannick E Silva2, Etienne Martin3, Aurélie Bertaut4, Magali Quivrin3, Léone Aubignac5, Alexandre Cochet2,6, Gilles Créhange7,8. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, 25000, Besançon, France. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Unicancer-Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, 21000, Dijon, France. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Unicancer-Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, 21000, Dijon, France. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Unicancer-Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, 21000, Dijon, France. 5. Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Oncology, Unicancer-Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, 21000, Dijon, France. 6. Medical Imaging Group, IMAC CNRS FRE2005, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Unicancer-Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, 21000, Dijon, France. gcrehange@cgfl.fr. 8. Medical Imaging Group, IMAC CNRS FRE2005, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France. gcrehange@cgfl.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The concept of metastasis-directed therapy for nodal oligorecurrences with stereotactic body radiotherapy is increasingly accepted. Hence, the comparison between salvage extended field radiotherapy (s-EFRT) and salvage involved field radiotherapy (s-IFRT) in patients with 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT+ nodal oligorecurrences from prostate cancer is worthy of investigation. METHODS: Patients with oligorecurrent nodes on FCH PET/CT treated with salvage radiotherapy between 2009 and 2017 in a single tertiary cancer centre were selected for this study. Patients treated with s-IFRT were compared with those treated with s-EFRT. Toxicities and times to failure (TTF) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The study included 62 patients with positive lymph nodes only who underwent FCH PET/CT for a rising PSA level after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Of these patients, 35 had s-IFRT and 27 had s-EFRT. After a median follow-up of 41.8 months (range 5.9-108.1 months), no differences were observed in acute or late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities of grade 2 or more between the two groups. The 3-year failure rates were 55.3% (95% CI 37.0-70.3%) in the s-IFRT group and 88.3% (95% CI 66.9-96.1%) in the s-EFRT group (p = 0.0094). In multivariate analysis of TTF, an interval of >5 years was significantly correlated with better outcomes (HR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.86, p = 0.023). There was a strong trend toward better outcomes with s-EFRT even after adjusting for concomitant androgen-deprivation therapy (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.27, p = 0.116). CONCLUSION: FCH PET-positive node-targeted s-EFRT is feasible with low rates of toxicity and longer TTF, suggesting that oligorecurrent nodal disease diagnosed on FCH PET is unlikely.
PURPOSE: The concept of metastasis-directed therapy for nodal oligorecurrences with stereotactic body radiotherapy is increasingly accepted. Hence, the comparison between salvage extended field radiotherapy (s-EFRT) and salvage involved field radiotherapy (s-IFRT) in patients with 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT+ nodal oligorecurrences from prostate cancer is worthy of investigation. METHODS:Patients with oligorecurrent nodes on FCH PET/CT treated with salvage radiotherapy between 2009 and 2017 in a single tertiary cancer centre were selected for this study. Patients treated with s-IFRT were compared with those treated with s-EFRT. Toxicities and times to failure (TTF) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The study included 62 patients with positive lymph nodes only who underwent FCH PET/CT for a rising PSA level after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Of these patients, 35 had s-IFRT and 27 had s-EFRT. After a median follow-up of 41.8 months (range 5.9-108.1 months), no differences were observed in acute or late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities of grade 2 or more between the two groups. The 3-year failure rates were 55.3% (95% CI 37.0-70.3%) in the s-IFRT group and 88.3% (95% CI 66.9-96.1%) in the s-EFRT group (p = 0.0094). In multivariate analysis of TTF, an interval of >5 years was significantly correlated with better outcomes (HR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.86, p = 0.023). There was a strong trend toward better outcomes with s-EFRT even after adjusting for concomitant androgen-deprivation therapy (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.27, p = 0.116). CONCLUSION:FCH PET-positive node-targeted s-EFRT is feasible with low rates of toxicity and longer TTF, suggesting that oligorecurrent nodal disease diagnosed on FCH PET is unlikely.
Authors: Ulrike Schick; Sandra Jorcano; Philippe Nouet; Michel Rouzaud; Hansjoerg Vees; Thomas Zilli; Osman Ratib; Damien C Weber; Raymond Miralbell Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: S Hijazi; B Meller; C Leitsmann; A Strauss; J Meller; C O Ritter; J Lotz; H-U Schildhaus; L Trojan; C O Sahlmann Journal: Prostate Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Daniel T Schmid; Hubert John; Roland Zweifel; Tibor Cservenyak; Gerrit Westera; Gerhard W Goerres; Gustav K von Schulthess; Thomas F Hany Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Piet Ost; Alberto Bossi; Karel Decaestecker; Gert De Meerleer; Gianluca Giannarini; R Jeffrey Karnes; Mack Roach; Alberto Briganti Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Annika Herlemann; Vera Wenter; Alexander Kretschmer; Kolja M Thierfelder; Peter Bartenstein; Claudius Faber; Franz-Josef Gildehaus; Christian G Stief; Christian Gratzke; Wolfgang P Fendler Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ahmed Gawish; Matthias Walke; Burkard Röllich; Hans-Joachim Ochel; Thomas B Brunner Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-08-27 Impact factor: 4.322
Authors: Paul Rogowski; Mack Roach; Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Christian Trapp; Rieke von Bestenbostel; Run Shi; Alexander Buchner; Christian Stief; Claus Belka; Minglun Li Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Paul Rogowski; Christian Trapp; Rieke von Bestenbostel; Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Run Shi; Harun Ilhan; Alexander Kretschmer; Christian Stief; Ute Ganswindt; Claus Belka; Minglun Li Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Simon Kirste; Stephanie G C Kroeze; Christoph Henkenberens; Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Marco M E Vogel; Jessica Becker; Constantinos Zamboglou; Irene Burger; Thorsten Derlin; Peter Bartenstein; Juri Ruf; Christian la Fougère; Matthias Eiber; Hans Christiansen; Stephanie E Combs; Arndt-Christian Müller; Claus Belka; Matthias Guckenberger; Anca-Ligia Grosu Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 6.244