Literature DB >> 28685078

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in recurrent prostate cancer and a PSA level <2 ng/ml: Two case reports and a literature review.

Lars J Petersen1,2, Julie B Nielsen1,2, Katja Dettmann3, Rune V Fisker1,4, Uwe Haberkorn5,6, Louise Stenholt7, Helle D Zacho1,2.   

Abstract

Localization of prostate cancer recurrence, particularly in the bones, is a major challenge with standard of care imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence following curatively intended treatment. Gallium-68-labeled prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) is a novel and promising method for imaging in prostate cancer. The present study reports two cases of patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence, with evidence of bone metastases on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images and low prostate specific antigen PSA levels (<2 ng/ml) and PSA doubling time >6 months. The bone metastases were verified by supplementary imaging with 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT and magnetic resonance imaging as well as biochemical responses to androgen deprivation therapy. Therefore, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is promising for the restaging of patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence, including patients with low PSA levels and low PSA kinetics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen; biochemical recurrence; positron emission tomography; prostate-specific antigen; prostate-specific antigen kinetics

Year:  2017        PMID: 28685078      PMCID: PMC5492698          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  25 in total

1.  [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to restage prostate cancer cases with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and no disease evidence on conventional imaging.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Alberto Briganti; Cesare Cozzarini; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea Salonia; Claudio Landoni; Luigi Gianolli; Nadia Di Muzio; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Cristina Messa
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Improved Metastasis-Free and Survival Outcomes With Early Salvage Radiotherapy in Men With Detectable Prostate-Specific Antigen After Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Bradley J Stish; Thomas M Pisansky; William S Harmsen; Brian J Davis; Katherine S Tzou; Richard Choo; Steven J Buskirk
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Comparison of 68Ga-labelled PSMA-11 and 11C-choline in the detection of prostate cancer metastases by PET/CT.

Authors:  Johannes Schwenck; Hansjoerg Rempp; Gerald Reischl; Stephan Kruck; Arnulf Stenzl; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christina Pfannenberg; Christian la Fougère
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Localizing sites of disease in patients with rising serum prostate-specific antigen up to 1ng/ml following prostatectomy: How much information can conventional imaging provide?

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Alexandre G Martin-Malburet; Toshikazu Takeda; Renato B Corradi; James Eastham; Andreas Wibmer; Evis Sala; Michael J Zelefsky; Wolfgang A Weber; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 6.  Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marlon Perera; Nathan Papa; Daniel Christidis; David Wetherell; Michael S Hofman; Declan G Murphy; Damien Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Peter A S Johnstone; Nali Pak; Raymond S Lance; J Brantley Thrasher; John P Foley; Robert H Riffenburgh; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Whole-body MRI: detecting bone metastases from prostate cancer.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Nakanishi; Junichiro Tanaka; Yasuhiro Nakaya; Noboru Maeda; Atsuhiko Sakamoto; Akiko Nakayama; Hiroki Satomura; Mio Sakai; Koji Konishi; Yoshiyuki Yamamoto; Akira Nagahara; Kazuo Nishimura; Satoshi Takenaka; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.374

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.