BACKGROUND: Recent research indicates that sexual minority women are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with heterosexual women; however, few studies of CVD risk exist for sexual minority men (SMM). This study aimed to determine whether disparities in CVD risk exist for SMM and if CVD risk is consistent across subgroups of SMM. METHODS: This study utilised publicly available data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), pooled from 2001 to 2010. CVD risk was calculated using the Framingham General CVD Risk Score and operationalised as the ratio of a participant's vascular and chronological age. Differences in this ratio were examined between heterosexual and SMM as a whole, and within subgroups of SMM. RESULTS: SMM had vascular systems that were, on average, 4% (95% CI -7.5% to -0.4%) younger than their heterosexual counterparts; however, adjustment for education and history of hard drug use rendered this difference statistically insignificant. Analysis of SMM subgroups revealed increased CVD risk for bisexual men and decreased CVD risk for both gay and homosexually experienced heterosexual men when compared with heterosexual men. Differences in CVD risk persisted for only bisexual and homosexually experienced heterosexual men after adjustment for education and history of hard drug use. CONCLUSIONS: Subgroups of SMM are at increased risk for CVD compared with heterosexual men, and this increased risk cannot be completely attributed to differences in demographic characteristics or negative health behaviours.
BACKGROUND: Recent research indicates that sexual minority women are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with heterosexual women; however, few studies of CVD risk exist for sexual minority men (SMM). This study aimed to determine whether disparities in CVD risk exist for SMM and if CVD risk is consistent across subgroups of SMM. METHODS: This study utilised publicly available data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), pooled from 2001 to 2010. CVD risk was calculated using the Framingham General CVD Risk Score and operationalised as the ratio of a participant's vascular and chronological age. Differences in this ratio were examined between heterosexual and SMM as a whole, and within subgroups of SMM. RESULTS: SMM had vascular systems that were, on average, 4% (95% CI -7.5% to -0.4%) younger than their heterosexual counterparts; however, adjustment for education and history of hard drug use rendered this difference statistically insignificant. Analysis of SMM subgroups revealed increased CVD risk for bisexual men and decreased CVD risk for both gay and homosexually experienced heterosexual men when compared with heterosexual men. Differences in CVD risk persisted for only bisexual and homosexually experienced heterosexual men after adjustment for education and history of hard drug use. CONCLUSIONS: Subgroups of SMM are at increased risk for CVD compared with heterosexual men, and this increased risk cannot be completely attributed to differences in demographic characteristics or negative health behaviours.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cardiovascular disease; GENDER; Health inequalities; SOCIAL INEQUALITIES
Authors: Kenneth H Mayer; Judith B Bradford; Harvey J Makadon; Ron Stall; Hilary Goldhammer; Stewart Landers Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Elisabeth P Gruskin; Gregory L Greenwood; Marilyn Matevia; Lance M Pollack; Larry L Bye Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-06-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Don Operario; Kristi E Gamarel; Benjamin M Grin; Ji Hyun Lee; Christopher W Kahler; Brandon D L Marshall; Jacob J van den Berg; Nickolas D Zaller Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Billy A Caceres; Abraham A Brody; Perry N Halkitis; Caroline Dorsen; Gary Yu; Deborah A Chyun Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Cari Jo Clark; Iris W Borowsky; John Salisbury; Joann Usher; Rachael A Spencer; Julia M Przedworski; Lynette M Renner; Colleen Fisher; Susan A Everson-Rose Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Robert-Paul Juster; David Matthew Doyle; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Bethany G Everett; L Zachary DuBois; Jennifer J McGrath Journal: Stress Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.493
Authors: Gregory Phillips; Lauren B Beach; Blair Turner; Brian A Feinstein; Rachel Marro; Morgan M Philbin; Paul Salamanca; Dylan Felt; Michelle Birkett Journal: Arch Sex Behav Date: 2019-05-23