Grant W Farmer1, John R Blosnich2,3, Jennifer M Jabson4, Derrick D Matthews3. 1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. 2. VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Public Health, College of Education Health and Human Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Geographic location is a significant factor that influences health status and health disparities. Yet, little is known about the relationship between geographic location and health and health disparities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) persons. This study used a US population-based sample to evaluate the associations of sexual orientation with health indicators by rural/nonrural residence. METHODS: Data were pooled from the 10 states that collected sexual orientation in the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. Rural status was defined using metropolitan statistical area, and group differences by sexual orientation were stratified by gender and rural/nonrural status. Chi-square tests for categorical variables were used to assess bivariate relationships. Multivariable logistic regression models stratified by gender and rural/nonrural status were used to assess the association of sexual orientation to health indicators, while adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, and partnership status. All analyses were weighted to adjust for the complex sampling design. FINDINGS: Significant differences between LGB and heterosexual participants emerged for several health indicators, with bisexuals having a greater number of differences than gay men/lesbians. There were fewer differences in health indicators for rural LGB participants compared to heterosexuals than nonrural participants. CONCLUSIONS: Rural residence appears to influence the pattern of LGB health disparities. Future work is needed to confirm and identify the exact etiology or rural/nonrural differences in LGB health.
PURPOSE: Geographic location is a significant factor that influences health status and health disparities. Yet, little is known about the relationship between geographic location and health and health disparities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) persons. This study used a US population-based sample to evaluate the associations of sexual orientation with health indicators by rural/nonrural residence. METHODS: Data were pooled from the 10 states that collected sexual orientation in the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. Rural status was defined using metropolitan statistical area, and group differences by sexual orientation were stratified by gender and rural/nonrural status. Chi-square tests for categorical variables were used to assess bivariate relationships. Multivariable logistic regression models stratified by gender and rural/nonrural status were used to assess the association of sexual orientation to health indicators, while adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, and partnership status. All analyses were weighted to adjust for the complex sampling design. FINDINGS: Significant differences between LGB and heterosexual participants emerged for several health indicators, with bisexuals having a greater number of differences than gay men/lesbians. There were fewer differences in health indicators for rural LGB participants compared to heterosexuals than nonrural participants. CONCLUSIONS: Rural residence appears to influence the pattern of LGB health disparities. Future work is needed to confirm and identify the exact etiology or rural/nonrural differences in LGB health.
Authors: Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Katie A McLaughlin; Katherine M Keyes; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Demetria N Cain; Chloe Mirzayi; H Jonathon Rendina; Ana Ventuneac; Christian Grov; Jeffrey T Parsons Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Billy A Caceres; Abraham Brody; Rachel E Luscombe; Jillian E Primiano; Peter Marusca; Edward M Sitts; Deborah Chyun Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Gregory Sallabank; Tanaka M D Chavanduka; Alison R Walsh; Patrick Sullivan; James Wolfe; Rebecca Filipowicz; Erin E Bonar; Keith J Horvath; Benyam Hailu; José Bauermeister; Rob Stephenson Journal: Sex Res Social Policy Date: 2021-10-22