Grant W Farmer1, Jennifer M Jabson, Kathleen K Bucholz, Deborah J Bowen. 1. Grant W. Farmer is with the Department of Epidemiology, Saint Louis University School of Public Health, St. Louis, MO. Jennifer M. Jabson and Deborah J. Bowen are with the Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Kathleen K. Bucholz is with the Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if sexual-minority women were at greater risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than their heterosexual counterparts. METHODS: We aggregated data from the 2001-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys to examine differences in CVD risk between heterosexual and sexual-minority women by using the Framingham General CVD Risk Score to calculate a ratio of vascular and chronological age. We also examined differences in the prevalence of various CVD risk factors. RESULTS: Sexual-minority women were more likely to be current or former smokers, to report a history of drug use, to report risky drinking, and to report a family history of CVD. On average, sexual-minority women were 13.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.5%, 19.3%) older in vascular terms than their chronological age, which was 5.7% (95% CI = 1.5%, 9.8%) greater than that of their heterosexual counterparts. Family history of CVD and history of drug use were unrelated to increased CVD risk, and this risk was not fully explained by either risky drinking or smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual-minority women are at increased risk for CVD compared with heterosexual women.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if sexual-minority women were at greater risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than their heterosexual counterparts. METHODS: We aggregated data from the 2001-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys to examine differences in CVD risk between heterosexual and sexual-minority women by using the Framingham General CVD Risk Score to calculate a ratio of vascular and chronological age. We also examined differences in the prevalence of various CVD risk factors. RESULTS: Sexual-minority women were more likely to be current or former smokers, to report a history of drug use, to report risky drinking, and to report a family history of CVD. On average, sexual-minority women were 13.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.5%, 19.3%) older in vascular terms than their chronological age, which was 5.7% (95% CI = 1.5%, 9.8%) greater than that of their heterosexual counterparts. Family history of CVD and history of drug use were unrelated to increased CVD risk, and this risk was not fully explained by either risky drinking or smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual-minority women are at increased risk for CVD compared with heterosexual women.
Authors: S D Cochran; V M Mays; D Bowen; S Gage; D Bybee; S J Roberts; R S Goldstein; A Robison; E J Rankow; J White Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cari Jo Clark; Iris W Borowsky; John Salisbury; Joann Usher; Rachael A Spencer; Julia M Przedworski; Lynette M Renner; Colleen Fisher; Susan A Everson-Rose Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Robert-Paul Juster; David Matthew Doyle; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Bethany G Everett; L Zachary DuBois; Jennifer J McGrath Journal: Stress Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.493
Authors: Heather L Corliss; Nicole A VanKim; Hee-Jin Jun; S Bryn Austin; Biling Hong; Molin Wang; Frank B Hu Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 19.112