BACKGROUND: Leaders in academic medicine are often selected from the ranks of physician-researchers, whose demanding careers involve multiple professional commitments that must also be balanced with demands at home. OBJECTIVE: To gain a more nuanced understanding of work-life balance issues from the perspective of a large and diverse group of faculty clinician-researchers and their mentors. DESIGN: A qualitative study with semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted from 2010 to 2011, using inductive analysis and purposive sampling. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred former recipients of U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) K08 or K23 career development awards and 28 of their mentors. APPROACH: Three researchers with graduate training in qualitative methods conducted the interviews and thematically coded verbatim transcripts. KEY RESULTS: Five themes emerged related to work-life balance: (1) the challenge and importance of work-life balance for contemporary physician-researchers, (2) how gender roles and spousal dynamics make these issues more challenging for women, (3) the role of mentoring in this area, (4) the impact of institutional policies and practices intended to improve work-life balance, and (5) perceptions of stereotype and stigma associated with utilization of these programs. CONCLUSIONS: In academic medicine, in contrast to other fields in which a lack of affordable childcare may be the principal challenge, barriers to work-life balance appear to be deeply rooted within professional culture. A combination of mentorship, interventions that target institutional and professional culture, and efforts to destigmatize reliance on flexibility (with regard to timing and location of work) are most likely to promote the satisfaction and success of the new generation of clinician-researchers who desire work-life balance.
BACKGROUND: Leaders in academic medicine are often selected from the ranks of physician-researchers, whose demanding careers involve multiple professional commitments that must also be balanced with demands at home. OBJECTIVE: To gain a more nuanced understanding of work-life balance issues from the perspective of a large and diverse group of faculty clinician-researchers and their mentors. DESIGN: A qualitative study with semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted from 2010 to 2011, using inductive analysis and purposive sampling. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred former recipients of U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) K08 or K23 career development awards and 28 of their mentors. APPROACH: Three researchers with graduate training in qualitative methods conducted the interviews and thematically coded verbatim transcripts. KEY RESULTS: Five themes emerged related to work-life balance: (1) the challenge and importance of work-life balance for contemporary physician-researchers, (2) how gender roles and spousal dynamics make these issues more challenging for women, (3) the role of mentoring in this area, (4) the impact of institutional policies and practices intended to improve work-life balance, and (5) perceptions of stereotype and stigma associated with utilization of these programs. CONCLUSIONS: In academic medicine, in contrast to other fields in which a lack of affordable childcare may be the principal challenge, barriers to work-life balance appear to be deeply rooted within professional culture. A combination of mentorship, interventions that target institutional and professional culture, and efforts to destigmatize reliance on flexibility (with regard to timing and location of work) are most likely to promote the satisfaction and success of the new generation of clinician-researchers who desire work-life balance.
Authors: Rochelle D Jones; Jacquelyn Miller; C Ann Vitous; Chris Krenz; Kathleen T Brady; Ann J Brown; Gail L Daumit; Amelia F Drake; Victoria J Fraser; Katherine E Hartmann; Judith S Hochman; Susan Girdler; Adina L Kalet; Anne M Libby; Christina Mangurian; Judith G Regensteiner; Kimberly Yonkers; Reshma Jagsi Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Sherif M Badawy; Vandy Black; Emily R Meier; Kasiani C Myers; Kerice Pinkney; Caroline Hastings; Joanne M Hilden; Patrick Zweidler-McKay; Linda C Stork; Theodore S Johnson; Sarah R Vaiselbuh Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Robert A Salata; Mark W Geraci; Don C Rockey; Melvin Blanchard; Nancy J Brown; Lucien J Cardinal; Maria Garcia; Michael P Madaio; James D Marsh; Robert F Todd Journal: Acad Med Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Phyllis L Carr; Deborah Helitzer; Karen Freund; Alyssa Westring; Richard McGee; Patricia B Campbell; Christine V Wood; Amparo Villablanca Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 5.128