OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and findings of combined dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) lung ventilation/perfusion imaging in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: This study was institutional review board-approved and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Thirty-two subjects (aged 11-61 years) underwent combined xenon-enhanced ventilation and iodine-enhanced perfusion DECT. Ventilation, perfusion and morphological information were visually interpreted. Ventilation/perfusion information was classified as mismatch (differing patterns) or match (concordant patterns). Adverse reactions and radiation doses were recorded for each subject. RESULTS: Of 32 patients undergoing xenon-enhanced DECT, six patients reported adverse reactions (shortness of breath, n = 2; mild dizziness, n = 3; limb numbness, n = 1). Twenty-eight of 32 patients could be included into the data analysis. PE was detected in 10/28 patients. PE-related ventilation/perfusion mismatch was found in 17 lung lobes in 8/10 patients and matched ventilation/perfusion was detected in 2 patients. Eighteen patients had no PE. In this group, there was no case of a ventilation/perfusion mismatch. Matched ventilation/perfusion impairment was seen in one patient. The overall radiation dose from two DECT acquisitions was 4.8 ± 1.4 mSv (range 2.7-7.5 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: DECT lung ventilation/perfusion imaging is feasible and can visualise ventilation/perfusion match or mismatch in patients with suspected PE. KEY POINTS: • Combined dual-energy CT lung ventilation/perfusion imaging is feasible. • Combined dual-energy CT ventilation/perfusion imaging provides lung morphological and functional information. • Dual-energy CT can demonstrate ventilation/perfusion mismatch in patients with pulmonary embolism.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and findings of combined dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) lung ventilation/perfusion imaging in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: This study was institutional review board-approved and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Thirty-two subjects (aged 11-61 years) underwent combined xenon-enhanced ventilation and iodine-enhanced perfusion DECT. Ventilation, perfusion and morphological information were visually interpreted. Ventilation/perfusion information was classified as mismatch (differing patterns) or match (concordant patterns). Adverse reactions and radiation doses were recorded for each subject. RESULTS: Of 32 patients undergoing xenon-enhanced DECT, six patients reported adverse reactions (shortness of breath, n = 2; mild dizziness, n = 3; limb numbness, n = 1). Twenty-eight of 32 patients could be included into the data analysis. PE was detected in 10/28 patients. PE-related ventilation/perfusion mismatch was found in 17 lung lobes in 8/10 patients and matched ventilation/perfusion was detected in 2 patients. Eighteen patients had no PE. In this group, there was no case of a ventilation/perfusion mismatch. Matched ventilation/perfusion impairment was seen in one patient. The overall radiation dose from two DECT acquisitions was 4.8 ± 1.4 mSv (range 2.7-7.5 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: DECT lung ventilation/perfusion imaging is feasible and can visualise ventilation/perfusion match or mismatch in patients with suspected PE. KEY POINTS: • Combined dual-energy CT lung ventilation/perfusion imaging is feasible. • Combined dual-energy CT ventilation/perfusion imaging provides lung morphological and functional information. • Dual-energy CT can demonstrate ventilation/perfusion mismatch in patients with pulmonary embolism.
Authors: Susan Miles; Kerry M Rogers; Paul Thomas; Barry Soans; John Attia; Christian Abel; Elizabeth Holt; Catherine A D'Este; Michael J Hensley Journal: Chest Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Martine Remy-Jardin; Massimo Pistolesi; Lawrence R Goodman; Warren B Gefter; Alexander Gottschalk; John R Mayo; H Dirk Sostman Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sven F Thieme; Sandra Hoegl; Konstantin Nikolaou; Juergen Fisahn; Michael Irlbeck; Daniel Maxien; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker; Thorsten R C Johnson Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sven F Thieme; Christoph R Becker; Marcus Hacker; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Thorsten R C Johnson Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2008-09-05 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Long Jiang Zhang; Guang Ming Lu; Felix G Meinel; Andrew D McQuiston; James G Ravenel; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Serdar Charyyev; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Beth Ghavidel; Jonathan J Beitler; Mark McDonald; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jun Zhou; Xiaofeng Yang Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Vincent Cascio; Man Hon; Linda B Haramati; Animesh Gour; Peter Spiegler; Sanjeev Bhalla; Douglas S Katz Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 3.039