| Literature DB >> 23758890 |
Antony R Liddell, Gareth Prosser.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adult Hip Dysplasia (AHD) has been strongly linked with the development of hip osteoarthritis. The complexity and therefore resultant steep learning curve of the Bernese osteotomy for AHD has been well described. The purpose of this study was to analyse the efficacy of a technically less demanding interlocking pelvic triple osteotomy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23758890 PMCID: PMC3718640 DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Figure 1Three dimensional representation of Interlocking Pelvic Triple Osteotomy - preoperative cuts and postoperative orientation.
Figure 2Clinical photograph demonstrating use of the external fixator to control orientation of the osteotomy.
Figure 3Example of preoperative (A) and postoperative (B) radiographs following Interlocking Pelvic Triple Osteotomy. Note in the preoperative film evidence of a previous proximal femoral varus osteotomy. In the postoperative film, the acetabular orientation has been corrected, and the proximal femur has been repositioned to a physiological orientation.
Figure 4Screen shot of Hip Normsoftware applied to post operative radiograph of study patient. Note the calculation of Acetabular Coverage of the Femoral Head.
Patient ages, & pre and postoperative clinical outcome measures
| Patient 1 (Lt) | 32 | 7 | 39 | 2 | 7 |
| Patient 2 (Rt) | 25 | 25 | 42 | 4 | 7 |
| Patient 2 (Lt) | 25 | 42 | 44 | 7 | 10 |
| Patient 3 (Rt) | 26 | 28 | 40 | 4 | 6 |
| Patient 4 (Rt) | 16 | 9 | 44 | 2 | 7 |
| Patient 5 (Lt) | 21 | 29 | 40 | 5 | 9 |
| Patient 6 (Rt) | 17 | 15 | 33 | 3 | 5 |
| Patient 7 (Rt) | 22 | 24 | 32 | 4 | 6 |
Pre and postoperative radiological indices
| Patient 1 (Lt) | 3 | 34 | 32 | 2 | 57 | 89.2 |
| Patient 2 (Rt) | 7 | 43 | 22 | 2 | 53.2 | 89 |
| Patient 2 (Lt) | 3 | 27 | 21 | 0 | 60.1 | 84.6 |
| Patient 3 (Rt) | 9 | 29 | 22 | 6 | 62.6 | 81.6 |
| Patient 4 (Rt) | 12 | 24 | 20 | 0 | 57.3 | 74.9 |
| Patient 5 (Lt) | 12 | 29 | 17 | 0 | 65 | 80.1 |
| Patient 6 (Rt) | 10 | 45 | 25 | 0 | 57.9 | 80.4 |
| Patient 7 (Rt) | 14 | 29 | 21 | 0 | 61 | 82 |