| Literature DB >> 23758725 |
María Muñoz-Amatriaín, Steven R Eichten, Thomas Wicker, Todd A Richmond, Martin Mascher, Burkhard Steuernagel, Uwe Scholz, Ruvini Ariyadasa, Manuel Spannagl, Thomas Nussbaumer, Klaus F X Mayer, Stefan Taudien, Matthias Platzer, Jeffrey A Jeddeloh, Nathan M Springer, Gary J Muehlbauer, Nils Stein.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence for the prevalence of copy number variation (CNV) and its role in phenotypic variation in many eukaryotic species. Here we use array comparative genomic hybridization to explore the extent of this type of structural variation in domesticated barley cultivars and wild barleys.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23758725 PMCID: PMC3706897 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r58
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol ISSN: 1474-7596 Impact factor: 13.583
Number and percentage of copy number variants for each genotype compared to Morex.
| Contrast | UpCNV | DownCNV/PAV | Total | Events with CNV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barke | 612 | 6,081 | 6,693 | 3.2 |
| Betzes | 606 | 5,620 | 6,226 | 2.9 |
| Harrington | 464 | 5,767 | 6,231 | 2.9 |
| Haruna Nijo | 500 | 6,000 | 6,500 | 3.1 |
| Bowman | 440 | 4,655 | 5,095 | 2.4 |
| Igri | 462 | 6,874 | 7,336 | 3.5 |
| Steptoe | 449 | 6,335 | 6,784 | 3.2 |
| Franka | 506 | 5,857 | 6,363 | 3.0 |
| Total cultivated barley | _a | _a | 16,918 | 8.0 |
| Hsp11 | 827 | 8,487 | 9,314 | 4.4 |
| Hsp248 | 821 | 8,709 | 9,530 | 4.5 |
| Hsp278 | 768 | 8,470 | 9,238 | 4.4 |
| Hsp357 | 875 | 8,666 | 9,541 | 4.5 |
| Hsp462 | 861 | 8,759 | 9,620 | 4.5 |
| Hsp730 | 834 | 8,384 | 9,218 | 4.4 |
| Total wild barley | _a | _a | 26,200 | 12.4 |
| All genotypes | _a | _a | 31,494 | 14.9 |
The total numbers and percentages of CNVs considering all cultivated barleys, wild barleys, and genotypes are also shown.
aNumbers not displayed as one contig fragment can be an UpCNV in one of the genotypes of the category and DownCNV/PAV in another.
Figure 1Frequency spectrum of CNV. (A) Percentage of CNVs identified in one to 14 genotypes relative to the total number of events; (B) frequency spectra comparison between wild and cultivated barley.
Figure 2Distribution of CNV per chromosome for all genotypes, wild barleys, and cultivated barleys. The bars represent percentages of CNVs assigned to each chromosome relative to the total number of contig fragments present on the corresponding chromosome. The single asterisk indicates that, considering all genotypes, the percentage of CNV on 4H is significantly lower compared to other chromosomes (t-test P value = 0.0002), while the double asterisk indicates the frequency of CNV on 4H in cultivated barley is significantly lower than wild barley (P value = 0.003 by t-test).
Figure 3Distribution and frequency of structural variation across the seven barley chromosomes. The upper plots show, for each barley chromosome, all variants assigned to chromosome positions and the number of genotypes sharing each variant, with colors indicating the type of structural variation (blue=UpCNV; red=DownCNV/PAV; green=Up and Down; grey=no variation). The lower panels shown for each chromosome illustrate the proportions of copy number variants per 1.5M bp window with respect to the total number of fragments assigned to that window, with proportions represented by a color gradient from black (proportion =0) to yellow (proportion = 1).
Figure 4Relationship between recombination rate and frequency of CNV. The black line represents the recombination trend calculated from the cM/Mb ratios along the physical map. All the chromosomes were combined and the window size was set to 10 Mb. The red dots represent the proportion of CNVs with respect to the total number of contig fragments in each 10 Mb bin.
Figure 5Comparison between CNVs identified in wild and cultivated barley. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlap between regions affected by CNV in both subgroups. (B) Venn diagram illustrating the overlap in CNVs that affect coding sequences.
Analysis of Morex and Barke sequence alignments in regions showing CNV
| Sequence present in Barke (%) | Fragments with NoCNV ( | DownCNV/PAVs ( | UpCNVs ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 156 (6) | 114 (34) | 7 (11) |
| 0-24 | 31 (1) | 16 (5) | 0 (0) |
| 25-49 | 42 (2) | 18 (5) | 3 (5) |
| 50-74 | 59 (2) | 25 (7) | 2 (3) |
| 75-99 | 280 (10) | 84 (25) | 8 (13) |
| 100 | 2,130 (79) | 80 (24) | 49(79) |
| Total number of contig fragments analyzed | 2,698 (100) | 337 (100) | 69 (100) |
For all contig fragments showing UpCNV and DownCNV/PAV, we calculated the percentage of the sequence that was present in Barke. Contig fragments not affected by CNV (NoCNV) were also analyzed.
Figure 6Examples of sequence alignments of contig fragments containing DownCNV/PAVs. The sequence of the barley cultivar Morex is shown at the top and the sequence of cultivar Barke at the bottom. (A) Schematic representation of how an insertion in Barke can lead to a DownCNV/PAV call. Sequence regions that are orthologous are connected by shaded areas. The additional sequence in Barke is depicted in light blue. The full contig fragment is composed of 10 overlapping probes. Those probes which overlap the breakpoint of the insertion will produce a low intensity signals or no signals, resulting in a reduced overall signal of the targeted contig fragment. (B) Contig fragments with multiple insertions/deletions. (C) Contig fragment with multiple deletions, including one that expands past the border of the fragment. (D) Contig fragment that contains additional sequences in Barke. (E) Contig fragment that contains an insertion/deletion that most likely originates from template slippage. The numbers in circles identify different types of insertions/deletions: 1, insertion/deletion that contains no obvious signature; 2, insertion/deletion that shows a typical signature of double-strand break repair via single-strand annealing (SSA); 3, insertion/deletion which contains filler sequence (indicated by a curly bracket) and that presumably is the result of DSB repair via synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA); 4, insertion/deletion originated from template slippage of direct repeats (indicated by arrows).