Literature DB >> 22696021

Structural variants in the soybean genome localize to clusters of biotic stress-response genes.

Leah K McHale1, William J Haun, Wayne W Xu, Pudota B Bhaskar, Justin E Anderson, David L Hyten, Daniel J Gerhardt, Jeffrey A Jeddeloh, Robert M Stupar.   

Abstract

Genome-wide structural and gene content variations are hypothesized to drive important phenotypic variation within a species. Structural and gene content variations were assessed among four soybean (Glycine max) genotypes using array hybridization and targeted resequencing. Many chromosomes exhibited relatively low rates of structural variation (SV) among genotypes. However, several regions exhibited both copy number and presence-absence variation, the most prominent found on chromosomes 3, 6, 7, 16, and 18. Interestingly, the regions most enriched for SV were specifically localized to gene-rich regions that harbor clustered multigene families. The most abundant classes of gene families associated with these regions were the nucleotide-binding and receptor-like protein classes, both of which are important for plant biotic defense. The colocalization of SV with plant defense response signal transduction pathways provides insight into the mechanisms of soybean resistance gene evolution and may inform the development of new approaches to resistance gene cloning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22696021      PMCID: PMC3425179          DOI: 10.1104/pp.112.194605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  96 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Pervasive gene content variation and copy number variation in maize and its undomesticated progenitor.

Authors:  Ruth A Swanson-Wagner; Steven R Eichten; Sunita Kumari; Peter Tiffin; Joshua C Stein; Doreen Ware; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Gene conversion and the evolution of three leucine-rich repeat gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Mariana Mondragon-Palomino; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species.

Authors:  Kirsten Bomblies; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment.

Authors:  Ruiqiang Li; Chang Yu; Yingrui Li; Tak-Wah Lam; Siu-Ming Yiu; Karsten Kristiansen; Jun Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Evolution of a complex disease resistance gene cluster in diploid Phaseolus and tetraploid Glycine.

Authors:  Tom Ashfield; Ashley N Egan; Bernard E Pfeil; Nicolas W G Chen; Ram Podicheti; Milind B Ratnaparkhe; Carine Ameline-Torregrosa; Roxanne Denny; Steven Cannon; Jeff J Doyle; Valérie Geffroy; Bruce A Roe; M A Saghai Maroof; Nevin D Young; Roger W Innes
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Convergent evolution of disease resistance gene specificity in two flowering plant families.

Authors:  Tom Ashfield; Laura E Ong; Kan Nobuta; Christopher M Schneider; Roger W Innes
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Copy number variation and evolution in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  George H Perry; Fengtang Yang; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Carly Murphy; Tomas Fitzgerald; Arthur S Lee; Courtney Hyland; Anne C Stone; Matthew E Hurles; Chris Tyler-Smith; Evan E Eichler; Nigel P Carter; Charles Lee; Richard Redon
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Analysis of copy number variation in the rhesus macaque genome identifies candidate loci for evolutionary and human disease studies.

Authors:  Arthur S Lee; María Gutiérrez-Arcelus; George H Perry; Eric J Vallender; Welkin E Johnson; Gregory M Miller; Jan O Korbel; Charles Lee
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  KCTD13 is a major driver of mirrored neuroanatomical phenotypes of the 16p11.2 copy number variant.

Authors:  Christelle Golzio; Jason Willer; Michael E Talkowski; Edwin C Oh; Yu Taniguchi; Sébastien Jacquemont; Alexandre Reymond; Mei Sun; Akira Sawa; James F Gusella; Atsushi Kamiya; Jacques S Beckmann; Nicholas Katsanis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  80 in total

1.  The high polyphenol content of grapevine cultivar tannat berries is conferred primarily by genes that are not shared with the reference genome.

Authors:  Cecilia Da Silva; Gianpiero Zamperin; Alberto Ferrarini; Andrea Minio; Alessandra Dal Molin; Luca Venturini; Genny Buson; Paola Tononi; Carla Avanzato; Elisa Zago; Eduardo Boido; Eduardo Dellacassa; Carina Gaggero; Mario Pezzotti; Francisco Carrau; Massimo Delledonne
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Co-segregation analysis and mapping of the anthracnose Co-10 and angular leaf spot Phg-ON disease-resistance genes in the common bean cultivar Ouro Negro.

Authors:  M C Gonçalves-Vidigal; A S Cruz; G F Lacanallo; P S Vidigal Filho; L L Sousa; C M N A Pacheco; P McClean; P Gepts; M A Pastor-Corrales
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  NLR Mutations Suppressing Immune Hybrid Incompatibility and Their Effects on Disease Resistance.

Authors:  Kostadin E Atanasov; Changxin Liu; Alexander Erban; Joachim Kopka; Jane E Parker; Rubén Alcázar
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Genome-Wide Mapping of Structural Variations Reveals a Copy Number Variant That Determines Reproductive Morphology in Cucumber.

Authors:  Zhonghua Zhang; Linyong Mao; Huiming Chen; Fengjiao Bu; Guangcun Li; Jinjing Sun; Shuai Li; Honghe Sun; Chen Jiao; Rachel Blakely; Junsong Pan; Run Cai; Ruibang Luo; Yves Van de Peer; Evert Jacobsen; Zhangjun Fei; Sanwen Huang
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  High-Throughput Genotyping Technologies in Plant Taxonomy.

Authors:  Monica F Danilevicz; Cassandria G Tay Fernandez; Jacob I Marsh; Philipp E Bayer; David Edwards
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

6.  Unraveling genomic complexity at a quantitative disease resistance locus in maize.

Authors:  Tiffany M Jamann; Jesse A Poland; Judith M Kolkman; Laurie G Smith; Rebecca J Nelson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The barley Frost resistance-H2 locus.

Authors:  Marianna Pasquariello; Delfina Barabaschi; Axel Himmelbach; Burkhard Steuernagel; Ruvini Ariyadasa; Nils Stein; Francesco Gandolfi; Elena Tenedini; Isabella Bernardis; Enrico Tagliafico; Nicola Pecchioni; Enrico Francia
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 3.410

8.  Copy number variation at the HvCBF4-HvCBF2 genomic segment is a major component of frost resistance in barley.

Authors:  Enrico Francia; Caterina Morcia; Marianna Pasquariello; Valentina Mazzamurro; Justyna Anna Milc; Fulvia Rizza; Valeria Terzi; Nicola Pecchioni
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  AthCNV: A Map of DNA Copy Number Variations in the Arabidopsis Genome.

Authors:  Agnieszka Zmienko; Malgorzata Marszalek-Zenczak; Pawel Wojciechowski; Anna Samelak-Czajka; Magdalena Luczak; Piotr Kozlowski; Wojciech M Karlowski; Marek Figlerowicz
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Aluminum tolerance in maize is associated with higher MATE1 gene copy number.

Authors:  Lyza G Maron; Claudia T Guimarães; Matias Kirst; Patrice S Albert; James A Birchler; Peter J Bradbury; Edward S Buckler; Alison E Coluccio; Tatiana V Danilova; David Kudrna; Jurandir V Magalhaes; Miguel A Piñeros; Michael C Schatz; Rod A Wing; Leon V Kochian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.