Literature DB >> 11459065

Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection.

J L Dangl1, J D Jones.   

Abstract

Plants cannot move to escape environmental challenges. Biotic stresses result from a battery of potential pathogens: fungi, bacteria, nematodes and insects intercept the photosynthate produced by plants, and viruses use replication machinery at the host's expense. Plants, in turn, have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to perceive such attacks, and to translate that perception into an adaptive response. Here, we review the current knowledge of recognition-dependent disease resistance in plants. We include a few crucial concepts to compare and contrast plant innate immunity with that more commonly associated with animals. There are appreciable differences, but also surprising parallels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11459065     DOI: 10.1038/35081161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  1081 in total

Review 1.  What is the 'true' function of skin?

Authors:  C M Chuong; B J Nickoloff; P M Elias; L A Goldsmith; E Macher; P A Maderson; J P Sundberg; H Tagami; P M Plonka; K Thestrup-Pederson; B A Bernard; J M Schröder; P Dotto; C M Chang; M L Williams; K R Feingold; L E King; A M Kligman; J L Rees; E Christophers
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.960

2.  Specificity and cross-talk in plant signal transduction: January 2002 Keystone Symposium.

Authors:  Nancy A Eckardt
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Resistance rodeo: rounding up the full complement of Arabidopsis NBS-LRR genes.

Authors:  Nancy A Eckardt; Roger Innes
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  The tomato R gene products I-2 and MI-1 are functional ATP binding proteins with ATPase activity.

Authors:  Wladimir I L Tameling; Sandra D J Elzinga; Patricia S Darmin; Jack H Vossen; Frank L W Takken; Michel A Haring; Ben J C Cornelissen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Structural analysis of the maize rp1 complex reveals numerous sites and unexpected mechanisms of local rearrangement.

Authors:  Wusirika Ramakrishna; John Emberton; Matthew Ogden; Phillip SanMiguel; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  A gain-of-function mutation in an Arabidopsis Toll Interleukin1 receptor-nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat type R gene triggers defense responses and results in enhanced disease resistance.

Authors:  Yumiko Shirano; Pradeep Kachroo; Jyoti Shah; Daniel F Klessig
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  The N-terminal region of Pseudomonas type III effector AvrPtoB elicits Pto-dependent immunity and has two distinct virulence determinants.

Authors:  Fangming Xiao; Ping He; Robert B Abramovitch; Jennifer E Dawson; Linda K Nicholson; Jen Sheen; Gregory B Martin
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Apoplastic effectors secreted by two unrelated eukaryotic plant pathogens target the tomato defense protease Rcr3.

Authors:  Jing Song; Joe Win; Miaoying Tian; Sebastian Schornack; Farnusch Kaschani; Muhammad Ilyas; Renier A L van der Hoorn; Sophien Kamoun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Molecular basis for the RIN4 negative regulation of RPS2 disease resistance.

Authors:  Brad Day; Douglas Dahlbeck; Jeffrey Huang; Stephen T Chisholm; Donghui Li; Brian J Staskawicz
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Pto mutants differentially activate Prf-dependent, avrPto-independent resistance and gene-for-gene resistance.

Authors:  Fangming Xiao; Ming Lu; Jianxiong Li; Tiehan Zhao; Seung Young Yi; Venkatappa K Thara; Xiaoyan Tang; Jian-Min Zhou
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.