Literature DB >> 23756771

Centralization of services and reduction of adverse events in pancreatic cancer surgery.

Jamie Young1, Alistair Thompson, Iain Tait, Lynsey Waugh, Gillian McPhillips.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The perioperative period is critical in the outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer. The aim of the present analysis was to examine adverse events in patients dying under surgical care in relation to changes in the organization of pancreatic cancer surgery.
METHODS: From 1996 to 2005, 1,033 patients with pancreatic cancer, mean age of 71 years (range 21-97 years) died under surgical care. The incidence, mortality, and number of operations for pancreatic cancer remained stable across the time period, but the proportion of patients undergoing surgery in the five specialist cancer centers increased from 50 to 80 % (p < 0.001). Prior to death 260 (25 %) patients underwent operation and 96 (9 %) had endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). There was a significant rise in ERCP (p = 0.03) and a decrease in non-resectional operations (p = 0.001).
RESULTS: Since 1996, 52 (15 %) patients in whom 90 adverse events were recorded died following surgical intervention: 28 adverse events related to the perioperative period with 15 due to direct procedure complications such as bleeding or anastomotic leak; 13 were attributed to decision making around the choice or timing of the procedure. The postoperative mortality after curative pancreatic resection reduced from 3.5 to 1.8 %. Identified adverse events fell significantly in patients who died relating to the operative period (median of 3 per annum [1994-2000] to 1 per annum [2001-2005]) (p = 0.014) and medical care (3-0) (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous peer review audit has demonstrated a reduction in the number of adverse events in patients dying with pancreatic cancer under surgical care as increased numbers of patients treated in specialist cancer centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23756771     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2108-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan F Finks; Nicholas H Osborne; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Building a framework for trust: critical event analysis of deaths in surgical care.

Authors:  A M Thompson; P A Stonebridge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-14

4.  The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Mark Radzyner; David Rubin; James Dougherty; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization.

Authors:  V E P P Lemmens; K Bosscha; G van der Schelling; S Brenninkmeijer; J W W Coebergh; I H J T de Hingh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Adjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer: beyond gemcitabine. Highlights from the "2011 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium". San Francisco, CA, USA. January 20-22, 2011.

Authors:  Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2011-03-09

7.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Influence of specialization on the management and outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M O Bachmann; D Alderson; T J Peters; C Bedford; D Edwards; S Wotton; I M Harvey
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Wagner; C Redaelli; M Lietz; C A Seiler; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Benefits of specialisation in the management of pancreatic cancer: results of a Scottish population-based study.

Authors:  R W Parks; V Bettschart; S Frame; D L Stockton; D H Brewster; O J Garden
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Geographic Distribution of Adult Inpatient Surgery Capability in the USA.

Authors:  Adrian Diaz; Anna Schoenbrunner; Jordan Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe.

Authors:  Adam Polonski; Jakob R Izbicki; Faik G Uzunoglu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Variation in survival after surgery for peri-ampullary cancer in a regional cancer network.

Authors:  Bassem Amr; Golnaz Shahtahmassebi; Somaiah Aroori; Matthew J Bowles; Christopher D Briggs; David A Stell
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.