Literature DB >> 21717423

Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization.

V E P P Lemmens1, K Bosscha, G van der Schelling, S Brenninkmeijer, J W W Coebergh, I H J T de Hingh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-volume institutions are associated with improved clinical outcomes for pancreatic cancer. This study investigated the impact of centralizing pancreatic cancer surgery in the south of the Netherlands.
METHODS: All patients diagnosed in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry area in 1995-2000 (precentralization) and 2005-2008 (implementation of centralization agreements) with primary cancer of the pancreatic head, extrahepatic bile ducts, ampulla of Vater or duodenum were included. Resection rates, in-hospital mortality, 2-year survival and changes in treatment patterns were analysed. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for death.
RESULTS: Some 2129 patients were identified. Resection rates increased from 19·0 to 30·0 per cent (P < 0·001). The number of hospitals performing resections decreased from eight to three, and the annual number of resections per hospital increased from two to 16. The in-hospital mortality rate dropped from 24·4 to 3·6 per cent (P < 0·001) and was zero in 2008. The 2-year survival rate after surgery increased from 38·1 to 49·4 per cent (P = 0·001), and the rate irrespective of treatment increased from 10·3 to 16·0 per cent (P < 0·001). There was no improvement in 2-year survival in non-operated patients. After adjustment for relevant patient and tumour factors, those undergoing surgery more recently had a lower risk of death (hazard ratio 0·70, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·51 to 0·97). Changes in surgical patterns seemed largely to explain the improvements.
CONCLUSION: High-quality care can be achieved in regional hospitals through collaboration. Centralization should no longer be regarded as a threat by general hospitals but as a chance to improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21717423     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  36 in total

1.  Quality measurement and improvement in general surgery.

Authors:  Marisa Cevasco; Stanley W Ashley
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2011

2.  Centralization of services and reduction of adverse events in pancreatic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Jamie Young; Alistair Thompson; Iain Tait; Lynsey Waugh; Gillian McPhillips
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Pancreatic cancer from bench to bedside: molecular pathways and treatment options.

Authors:  Christoforos Kosmidis; Konstantinos Sapalidis; Efstathios Kotidis; Nikolaos Mixalopoulos; Paul Zarogoulidis; Drosos Tsavlis; Sofia Baka; Yan-Gao Man; John Kanellos
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

4.  Preparing for prospective clinical trials: a national initiative of an excellence registry for consecutive pancreatic cancer resections.

Authors:  Odo Gangl; Klaus Sahora; Peter Kornprat; Christian Margreiter; Florian Primavesi; Evelyne Bareck; Martin Schindl; Friedrich Längle; Dietmar Öfner; Hans-Jörg Mischinger; Johann Pratschke; Michael Gnant; Reinhold Függer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Training in therapeutic endoscopy: meeting present and future challenges.

Authors:  John Anderson; Melanie Lockett
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02-12

6.  Impact of centralization of pancreatoduodenectomy on reported radical resections rates in a nationwide pathology database.

Authors:  Veronica G Onete; Marc G Besselink; Chanielle M Salsbach; Casper H Van Eijck; Olivier R Busch; Dirk J Gouma; Ignace H de Hingh; Egbert Sieders; Cornelis H Dejong; Johan G Offerhaus; I Quintus Molenaar
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Is It Time to Centralize Ovarian Cancer Care in the United States?

Authors:  Renee A Cowan; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Ginger J Gardner; Douglas A Levine; Kara Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Oliver Zivanovic; William P Tew; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman; Hebert A Vargas Alvarez; Debra M Sarasohn; Svetlana Mironov; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  New biomarkers and targets in pancreatic cancer and their application to treatment.

Authors:  Eithne Costello; William Greenhalf; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Volume-outcome relationships in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Lydia G M van der Geest; L Bengt van Rijssen; I Quintus Molenaar; Ignace H de Hingh; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Olivier R C Busch; Valery E P P Lemmens; Marc G H Besselink
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Influence of Hospital Volume Effects and Minimum Caseload Requirements on Quality of Care in Pancreatic Surgery in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Krautz; Axel Denz; Georg F Weber; Robert Grützmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.