Literature DB >> 2375325

A prospective study of the prevalence of colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients with an age-related risk.

D A Johnson1, M S Gurney, R J Volpe, D M Jones, M M VanNess, S J Chobanian, J C Avalos, J L Buck, G Kooyman, E L Cattau.   

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in healthy, asymptomatic adults with an age-related risk for colorectal neoplasia. Ninety patients were studied with air contrast barium enema and colonoscopy. The study population included 61 males and 21 females, with an age range of 51-82 yr (65 +/- 2 yr). Adenomatous polyps were found in 27% of males and 14% of females or 24% of patients overall. Sixty-six percent of these neoplasms were above the rectosigmoid junction and the mean size of the polyps was 6.5 +/- 1.2 mm. In two patients, carcinoma was discovered. A linear association between age and the prevalence of colonic neoplasia was not demonstrated. This study demonstrates a relatively high prevalence of colonic neoplasia in patients with an age-related risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2375325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  46 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer incidence trends in the United States and United kingdom: evidence of right- to left-sided biological gradients with implications for screening.

Authors:  Rafael Meza; Jihyoun Jeon; Andrew G Renehan; E Georg Luebeck
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

3.  Results of a pilot study of endoscopic screening of first degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients in Italy.

Authors:  L Colombo; G Corti; F Magrì; A Marocchi; P Brambilla; C Crespi; L Manieri; S Ghezzi; D Giannone; L Merlino; P Mocarelli
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Colorectal cancer deaths attributable to nonuse of screening in the United States.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Chyke A Doubeni; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; S Lucas Goede; Theodore R Levin; Virginia P Quinn; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Douglas A Corley; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 5.  Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding--the role of endoscopy.

Authors:  Suryankanth R Gurudu; Jonathan A Leighton
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-05-11

6.  Screening for colorectal cancer and suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  G Stevenson
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

7.  Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Michele Morris; Rebecca A Gourevitch; David S Carrell; Daniel A Leffler; Sherri Rose; Julia B Greer; Seth D Crockett; Andrew Baer; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04

9.  The use of indigocarmine spray increases the colonoscopic detection rate of adenomas.

Authors:  Kazutomo Togashi; David G Hewett; Graham L Radford-Smith; Leo Francis; Barbara A Leggett; Mark N Appleyard
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Prevalence of proximal neoplasms among asymptomatic patients according to distal colorectal findings.

Authors:  Elife Erarslan; Cansel Turkay; Ayse Isik; Burak Uz; Arif Kaya; Nuket Bavbek
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.