Literature DB >> 20530677

Colorectal cancer incidence trends in the United States and United kingdom: evidence of right- to left-sided biological gradients with implications for screening.

Rafael Meza1, Jihyoun Jeon, Andrew G Renehan, E Georg Luebeck.   

Abstract

Several lines of evidence support the premise that screening colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but there may be differential benefits for right- and left-sided tumors. To better understand the biological basis of this differential effect, we derived biomathematical models of CRC incidence trends in U.S. and U.K. populations, representing relatively high- and low-prevalence screening, respectively. Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) registries (both 1973-2006), we derived stochastic multistage clonal expansion (MSCE) models for right-sided (proximal colon) and left-sided (distal colon and rectal) tumors. The MSCE concept is based on the initiation-promotion-progression paradigm of carcinogenesis and provides a quantitative description of natural tumor development from the initiation of an adenoma (via biallelic tumor suppressor gene inactivation) to the clinical detection of CRC. From 1,228,036 (SEER: 340,582; ONS: 887,454) cases, parameter estimates for models adjusted for calendar-year and birth-cohort effects showed that adenoma initiation rates were higher for right-sided tumors, whereas, paradoxically, adenoma growth rates were higher for left-sided tumors. The net effect was a higher cancer risk in the right colon only after age 70 years. Consistent with this finding, simulations of adenoma development predicted that the relative prevalence for right- versus left-sided tumors increases with increasing age, a differential effect most striking in women. Using a realistic biomathematical description of CRC development for two nationally representative registries, we show age- and sex-dependent biological gradients for right- and left-sided colorectal tumors. These findings argue for an age-, sex-, and site-directed approach to CRC screening. Copyright 2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20530677      PMCID: PMC2914859          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  47 in total

1.  Is there a true "shift" to the right colon in the incidence of colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; Jessica A Davila; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screening.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; David A Lieberman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Multistage carcinogenesis and the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E Georg Luebeck; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H J Järvinen; M Aarnio; H Mustonen; K Aktan-Collan; L A Aaltonen; P Peltomäki; A De La Chapelle; J P Mecklin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Variability of cell proliferation in the proximal and distal colon of normal rats and rats with dimethylhydrazine induced carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Qing-Yong Ma; Kate E Williamson; Brian J Rowlands
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  A multi-stage model of adenoma development.

Authors:  P F Pinsky
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Regula; Maciej Rupinski; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Jacek Pachlewski; Janina Orlowska; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; David R Wagner; Ching Y Lin; Gregory N Larkin; James D Rogge; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Estrogen plus progestin and colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; F Allan Hubbell; Joao Ascensao; Rebecca J Rodabough; Carol A Rosenberg; Victoria M Taylor; Randall Harris; Chu Chen; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Emily White
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Are there two sides to colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Barry Iacopetta
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  60 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population.

Authors:  Katherine Grailey; Sheraz R Markar; Alan Karthikesalingam; Rima Aboud; Paul Ziprin; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Association of dietary quercetin with reduced risk of proximal colon cancer.

Authors:  Zora Djuric; Richard K Severson; Ikuko Kato
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.900

3.  Distribution, size and shape of colorectal adenomas as determined by a colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate: Influence of age, sex and colonoscopy indication.

Authors:  Johannes L Klein; Murat Okcu; Karl H Preisegger; Heinz F Hammer
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  Diabetes and cancer (1): evaluating the temporal relationship between type 2 diabetes and cancer incidence.

Authors:  J A Johnson; B Carstensen; D Witte; S L Bowker; L Lipscombe; A G Renehan
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Childhood body mass index and height in relation to site-specific risks of colorectal cancers in adult life.

Authors:  Britt W Jensen; Michael Gamborg; Ismail Gögenur; Andrew G Renehan; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Jennifer L Baker
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Detectability of colorectal neoplasia with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT).

Authors:  Tomoko Hirakawa; Jun Kato; Yoshihiro Okumura; Keisuke Hori; Sakuma Takahashi; Hideyuki Suzuki; Mitsuhiro Akita; Reiji Higashi; Shunsuke Saito; Eisuke Kaji; Toshio Uraoka; Sakiko Hiraoka; Kazuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Biomarkers for personalizing omega-3 fatty acid dosing.

Authors:  Yan Jiang; Zora Djuric; Ananda Sen; Jianwei Ren; Dmitry Kuklev; Ian Waters; Lili Zhao; Charis L Uhlson; Yu H Hong; Robert C Murphy; Daniel P Normolle; William L Smith; Dean E Brenner
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-08-19

8.  Comparative benefits of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: a case-matched comparison of short- and long-term outcomes with middle-aged patients.

Authors:  Koki Otsuka; Toshimoto Kimura; Masanori Hakozaki; Mizunori Yaegashi; Teppei Matsuo; Hitoshi Fujii; Kei Sato; Tomoki Hatanaka; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Colorectal cancer incidence and survival by sub-site and stage of diagnosis: a population-based study at the advent of national screening.

Authors:  J McDevitt; H Comber; P M Walsh
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Case Studies of Gastric, Lung, and Oral Cancer Connect Etiologic Agent Prevalence to Cancer Incidence.

Authors:  Andrew F Brouwer; Marisa C Eisenberg; Rafael Meza
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.