Sara N Bleich1, Jodi Segal, Yang Wu, Renee Wilson, Youfa Wang. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. sbleich@jhsph.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study systematically reviewed community-based childhood obesity prevention programs in the United States and high-income countries. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library for relevant English-language studies. Studies were eligible if the intervention was primarily implemented in the community setting; had at least 1 year of follow-up after baseline; and compared results from an intervention to a comparison group. Two independent reviewers conducted title scans and abstract reviews and reviewed the full articles to assess eligibility. Each article received a double review for data abstraction. The second reviewer confirmed the first reviewer's data abstraction for completeness and accuracy. RESULTS: Nine community-based studies were included; 5 randomized controlled trials and 4 non-randomized controlled trials. One study was conducted only in the community setting, 3 were conducted in the community and school setting, and 5 were conducted in the community setting in combination with at least 1 other setting such as the home. Desirable changes in BMI or BMI z-score were found in 4 of the 9 studies. Two studies reported significant improvements in behavioral outcomes (1 in physical activity and 1 in vegetable intake). CONCLUSIONS: The strength of evidence is moderate that a combined diet and physical activity intervention conducted in the community with a school component is more effective at preventing obesity or overweight. More research and consistent methods are needed to understand the comparative effectiveness of childhood obesity prevention programs in the community setting.
OBJECTIVE: This study systematically reviewed community-based childhood obesity prevention programs in the United States and high-income countries. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library for relevant English-language studies. Studies were eligible if the intervention was primarily implemented in the community setting; had at least 1 year of follow-up after baseline; and compared results from an intervention to a comparison group. Two independent reviewers conducted title scans and abstract reviews and reviewed the full articles to assess eligibility. Each article received a double review for data abstraction. The second reviewer confirmed the first reviewer's data abstraction for completeness and accuracy. RESULTS: Nine community-based studies were included; 5 randomized controlled trials and 4 non-randomized controlled trials. One study was conducted only in the community setting, 3 were conducted in the community and school setting, and 5 were conducted in the community setting in combination with at least 1 other setting such as the home. Desirable changes in BMI or BMI z-score were found in 4 of the 9 studies. Two studies reported significant improvements in behavioral outcomes (1 in physical activity and 1 in vegetable intake). CONCLUSIONS: The strength of evidence is moderate that a combined diet and physical activity intervention conducted in the community with a school component is more effective at preventing obesity or overweight. More research and consistent methods are needed to understand the comparative effectiveness of childhood obesity prevention programs in the community setting.
Authors: Zuguo Mei; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn; Angelo Pietrobelli; Ailsa Goulding; Michael I Goran; William H Dietz Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: James F Sallis; Thomas L McKenzie; Terry L Conway; John P Elder; Judith J Prochaska; Marianne Brown; Michelle M Zive; Simon J Marshall; John E Alcaraz Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: S W Keith; D T Redden; P T Katzmarzyk; M M Boggiano; E C Hanlon; R M Benca; D Ruden; A Pietrobelli; J L Barger; K R Fontaine; C Wang; L J Aronne; S M Wright; M Baskin; N V Dhurandhar; M C Lijoi; C M Grilo; M DeLuca; A O Westfall; D B Allison Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2006-06-27 Impact factor: 5.551
Authors: Sara E Benjamin Neelon; Rebecca J Namenek Brouwer; Truls Østbye; Kelly R Evenson; Brian Neelon; Annie Martinie; Gary Bennett Journal: Child Obes Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Guadalupe X Ayala; Leticia Ibarra; Amy Binggeli-Vallarta; Jamie Moody; Thomas L McKenzie; Janette Angulo; Helina Hoyt; Emmeline Chuang; Theodore G Ganiats; Sheila Gahagan; Ming Ji; Michelle Zive; Emily Schmied; Elva M Arredondo; John P Elder Journal: Child Obes Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Leah Frerichs; Jeri Brittin; Dina Sorensen; Matthew J Trowbridge; Amy L Yaroch; Mohammad Siahpush; Melissa Tibbits; Terry T-K Huang Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lorrene D Ritchie; Patricia Wakimoto; Gail Woodward-Lopez; Frances E Thompson; Catherine M Loria; Dawn K Wilson; Janice Kao; Patricia B Crawford; Karen L Webb Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jerica M Berge; Seok Won Jin; Carrie Hanson; Jennifer Doty; Kimberly Jagaraj; Kent Braaten; William J Doherty Journal: Fam Syst Health Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 1.950