Sara E Benjamin Neelon1,2, Rebecca J Namenek Brouwer2, Truls Østbye1,2, Kelly R Evenson3, Brian Neelon4, Annie Martinie5, Gary Bennett6. 1. 1Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC. 2. 2Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC. 3. 3Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. 4Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 5. 5Alamance County Health Department, Burlington, NC. 6. 6Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Community-based interventions are promising approaches to obesity prevention, but few studies have prospectively evaluated them. The aim of this study was to evaluate a natural experiment—a community intervention designed to promote active living and decrease obesity within a small southern town. METHODS: In 2011, community leaders implemented the Mebane on the Move intervention—a community-wide effort to promote physical activity (PA) and decrease obesity among residents of Mebane, North Carolina. We measured child PA and BMI before and after the intervention, using a nearby town not implementing an intervention as the comparison. In total, we assessed 64 children from Mebane and 40 from the comparison community 6 months before, as well as 34 and 18 children 6 months after the intervention. We assessed PA with accelerometers worn for 7 days and calculated BMI z-scores using children's height and weight. We conducted multivariable linear regressions examining pre- to postintervention change in minutes of PA and BMI z-score, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: At follow-up, children in Mebane modestly increased their moderate-to-vigorous PA (1.3 minutes per hour; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2, 2.3; p=0.03) and vigorous activity (0.8 minutes per hour; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.5; p=0.04) more than comparison children. In intervention children, BMI z-scores decreased 0.5 units (kg/m(2); 95% CI: -0.9, -0.02; p=0.045), compared to children in the comparison community. CONCLUSIONS: We observed positive effects on PA level and weight status of children in Mebane, despite high rates of attrition, suggesting that the community-based intervention may have been successful.
BACKGROUND: Community-based interventions are promising approaches to obesity prevention, but few studies have prospectively evaluated them. The aim of this study was to evaluate a natural experiment—a community intervention designed to promote active living and decrease obesity within a small southern town. METHODS: In 2011, community leaders implemented the Mebane on the Move intervention—a community-wide effort to promote physical activity (PA) and decrease obesity among residents of Mebane, North Carolina. We measured child PA and BMI before and after the intervention, using a nearby town not implementing an intervention as the comparison. In total, we assessed 64 children from Mebane and 40 from the comparison community 6 months before, as well as 34 and 18 children 6 months after the intervention. We assessed PA with accelerometers worn for 7 days and calculated BMI z-scores using children's height and weight. We conducted multivariable linear regressions examining pre- to postintervention change in minutes of PA and BMI z-score, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: At follow-up, children in Mebane modestly increased their moderate-to-vigorous PA (1.3 minutes per hour; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2, 2.3; p=0.03) and vigorous activity (0.8 minutes per hour; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.5; p=0.04) more than comparison children. In intervention children, BMI z-scores decreased 0.5 units (kg/m(2); 95% CI: -0.9, -0.02; p=0.045), compared to children in the comparison community. CONCLUSIONS: We observed positive effects on PA level and weight status of children in Mebane, despite high rates of attrition, suggesting that the community-based intervention may have been successful.
Authors: Deborah A Cohen; Bing Han; Jennifer Isacoff; Bianca Shulaker; Stephanie Williamson; Terry Marsh; Thomas L McKenzie; Megan Weir; Rajiv Bhatia Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2014-06-20
Authors: Rachael W Taylor; Kirsten A McAuley; Wyn Barbezat; Victoria L Farmer; Sheila M Williams; Jim I Mann Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Christina D Economos; Raymond R Hyatt; Jeanne P Goldberg; Aviva Must; Elena N Naumova; Jessica J Collins; Miriam E Nelson Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Dustin T Duncan; Mona Sharifi; Steven J Melly; Richard Marshall; Thomas D Sequist; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Alexander Wray; Gina Martin; Emma Ostermeier; Alina Medeiros; Malcolm Little; Kristen Reilly; Jason Gilliland Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ariella R Korn; Erin Hennessy; Alison Tovar; Camille Finn; Ross A Hammond; Christina D Economos Journal: Child Obes Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Rubén Aragón-Martín; María Del Mar Gómez-Sánchez; David Jiménez-Pavón; José Manuel Martínez-Nieto; Mónica Schwarz-Rodríguez; Carmen Segundo-Iglesias; José Pedro Novalbos-Ruiz; María José Santi-Cano; José Castro-Piñero; Carmen Lineros-González; Mariano Hernán-García; Amelia Rodríguez-Martín Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anthony D Okely; Davina Ghersi; Sarah P Loughran; Dylan P Cliff; Trevor Shilton; Rachel A Jones; Rebecca M Stanley; Julie Sherring; Natalie Toms; Simon Eckermann; Timothy S Olds; Zhiguang Zhang; Anne-Maree Parrish; Lisa Kervin; Sandra Downie; Jo Salmon; Clair Bannerman; Tamie Needham; Elaine Marshall; Jordy Kaufman; Layne Brown; Janecke Wille; Greg Wood; David R Lubans; Stuart J H Biddle; Shane Pill; Anthea Hargreaves; Natalie Jonas; Natasha Schranz; Perry Campbell; Karen Ingram; Hayley Dean; Adam Verrender; Yvonne Ellis; Kar Hau Chong; Dorothea Dumuid; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Catherine E Draper; Hayley Lewthwaite; Mark S Tremblay Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 6.457