Literature DB >> 23748369

Image quality and radiation dose of 128-slice dual-source CT venography using low kilovoltage combined with high-pitch scanning and automatic tube current modulation.

Chan Kue Park1, Ki Seok Choo, Ung Bae Jeon, Seung Kug Baik, Yong Woo Kim, Tae Un Kim, Chang Won Kim, Yeon Ju Jeong, Dong Wook Jeong, Soo Jin Lim.   

Abstract

To compare vascular enhancement, image quality, and radiation dose of 128-slice dual-source CT venography (CTV) between an imaging setting of 120 kVp with low pitch, and a setting of 100 kVp combined with high pitch and automatic tube current modulation. A total of 100 patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and varicose veins were divided into two groups: Group 1 [50 patients, 120 kVp, low pitch (0.6), and fixed 120 mA) and Group 2 (50 patients, 100 kVp, high pitch (3.0), and automatic tube current modulation]. Two radiologists, who were blinded to the image protocol, assessed vascular enhancement and image noise in the inferior vena cava (IVC), femoral vein, and popliteal vein. They also assigned an image quality score independently using a 5-point visual scale. Effective dose was estimated using the dose-length product (DLP). Group demographics, radiation dose, vascular enhancement, image noise, and image quality in the two groups were analyzed. Mean vascular enhancement of the IVC, femoral vein, and popliteal vein was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1, and images in group 2 had significantly higher image noise. However, there were no significant differences in subjective image quality score of the IVC, femoral vein, and popliteal vein. The mean DLP in group 2 (402.10 ± 94.29 mGy cm) was significantly lower than that in group 1 (973.36 ± 63.20 mGy cm) (P < 0.001). Lower extremity CTV using 100 kVp, high pitch (3.0), and automatic tube current modulation improved vascular enhancement with acceptable image quality and low radiation dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23748369     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0252-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  24 in total

1.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT.

Authors:  W Huda; E M Scalzetti; G Levin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach.

Authors:  John M Boone; Estella M Geraghty; J Anthony Seibert; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Indirect computed tomography venography of the lower extremities using single-source dual-energy computed tomography: advantage of low-kiloelectron volt monochromatic images.

Authors:  Naveen M Kulkarni; Dushyant V Sahani; Gaurav S Desai; Sanjeeva P Kalva
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings.

Authors:  Claudia Schueller-Weidekamm; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Michael Weber; Christian J Herold; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the chest.

Authors:  D Tack; P A Gevenois
Journal:  JBR-BTR       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

6.  Thromboembolic disease: variability of interobserver agreement in the interpretation of CT venography with CT pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  K Garg; J L Kemp; P D Russ; A E Barón
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Pulmonary embolism: radiation dose with multi-detector row CT and digital angiography for diagnosis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Coche; Stefaan Vynckier; Michelle Octave-Prignot
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Bernhard Schmidt; Bryan L Westerman; Hugh T Morgan; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Vascular enhancement and image quality of MDCT pulmonary angiography in 400 cases: comparison of standard and low kilovoltage settings.

Authors:  Shin Matsuoka; Andetta R Hunsaker; Ritu R Gill; Isabel B Oliva; Beatrice Trotman-Dickenson; Francine L Jacobson; Hiroto Hatabu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Radiation exposure from chest CT: issues and strategies.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Stefania Rizzo; David Kanarek; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Jo-Anne O Shephard
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.

Authors:  Jin Hyeok Kim; Ki Seok Choo; Tae Yong Moon; Jun Woo Lee; Ung Bae Jeon; Tae Un Kim; Jae Yeon Hwang; Myeong-Ja Yun; Dong Wook Jeong; Soo Jin Lim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Application of low-dose dual-source computed tomography angiography in children with complex congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Xian-Feng Chen; Fan Jiang; Lin Li; Yan Chen; Xin Chen; Yan-Yan Jiang; Li Xiang; Xiao-Jing Ma
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Image Quality and Radiation Dose in CT Venography Using Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction at 80 kVp versus Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V at 70 kVp.

Authors:  Chankue Park; Ki Seok Choo; Jin Hyeok Kim; Kyung Jin Nam; Ji Won Lee; Jin You Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Image quality and radiation dose of lower extremity CT angiography using 70 kVp, high pitch acquisition and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Li Qi; Felix G Meinel; Chang Sheng Zhou; Yan E Zhao; U Joseph Schoepf; Long Jiang Zhang; Guang Ming Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.