Literature DB >> 23747527

Ranking TEM cameras by their response to electron shot noise.

Patricia Grob1, Derek Bean, Dieter Typke, Xueming Li, Eva Nogales, Robert M Glaeser.   

Abstract

We demonstrate two ways in which the Fourier transforms of images that consist solely of randomly distributed electrons (shot noise) can be used to compare the relative performance of different electronic cameras. The principle is to determine how closely the Fourier transform of a given image does, or does not, approach that of an image produced by an ideal camera, i.e. one for which single-electron events are modeled as Kronecker delta functions located at the same pixels where the electrons were incident on the camera. Experimentally, the average width of the single-electron response is characterized by fitting a single Lorentzian function to the azimuthally averaged amplitude of the Fourier transform. The reciprocal of the spatial frequency at which the Lorentzian function falls to a value of 0.5 provides an estimate of the number of pixels at which the corresponding line-spread function falls to a value of 1/e. In addition, the excess noise due to stochastic variations in the magnitude of the response of the camera (for single-electron events) is characterized by the amount to which the appropriately normalized power spectrum does, or does not, exceed the total number of electrons in the image. These simple measurements provide an easy way to evaluate the relative performance of different cameras. To illustrate this point we present data for three different types of scintillator-coupled camera plus a silicon-pixel (direct detection) camera.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Camera performance; Modulation transfer function; Noise

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747527      PMCID: PMC3841286          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  6 in total

1.  Characterisation of the signal and noise transfer of CCD cameras for electron detection.

Authors:  R R Meyer; A I Kirkland
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Experimental characterisation of CCD cameras for HREM at 300 kV

Authors: 
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Fully automated measurement of the modulation transfer function of charge-coupled devices above the Nyquist frequency.

Authors:  Wouter Van den Broek; Sandra Van Aert; Dirk Van Dyck
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.127

4.  SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields.

Authors:  J Frank; M Radermacher; P Penczek; J Zhu; Y Li; M Ladjadj; A Leith
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.867

5.  Detective quantum efficiency of electron area detectors in electron microscopy.

Authors:  G McMullan; S Chen; R Henderson; A R Faruqi
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Enhanced imaging in low dose electron microscopy using electron counting.

Authors:  G McMullan; A T Clark; R Turchetta; A R Faruqi
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.689

  6 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Electron Tomography: A Three-Dimensional Analytic Tool for Hard and Soft Materials Research.

Authors:  Peter Ercius; Osama Alaidi; Matthew J Rames; Gang Ren
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Direct Detection Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy: A Method to Push the Limits of Resolution and Sensitivity.

Authors:  James L Hart; Andrew C Lang; Asher C Leff; Paolo Longo; Colin Trevor; Ray D Twesten; Mitra L Taheri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Quantitative characterization of electron detectors for transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  Rachel S Ruskin; Zhiheng Yu; Nikolaus Grigorieff
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.867

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.