Literature DB >> 35399822

Confidence Interval Estimation of the Youden index and corresponding cut-point for a combination of biomarkers under normality.

Kristopher Attwood1, Lili Tian2.   

Abstract

In prognostic/diagnostic medical research, it is often the goal to identify a biomarker that differentiates between patients with and without a condition, or patients that will have good or poor response to a given treatment. The statistical literature is abundant with methods for evaluating single biomarkers for these purposes. However, in practice, a single biomarker rarely captures all aspects of a disease process; therefore, it is often the case that using a combination of biomarkers will improve discriminatory ability. A variety of methods have been developed for combining biomarkers based on the maximization of some global measure or cost-function. These methods usually create a score based on a linear combination of the biomarkers, upon which the standard single biomarker methodologies (such as the Youden's index) are applied. However, these single biomarker methodologies do not account for the multivariable nature of the combined biomarker score. In this article we present generalized inference and bootstrap approaches to estimating confidence intervals for the Youden's index and corresponding cut-point for a combined biomarker. These methods account for inherent dependencies and provide accurate and efficient estimates. A simulation study and real-world example utilize data from a Duchene Muscular Dystrophy study are also presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Duchene Muscular Dystrophy; Generalized Inference; Linear Combinations; ROC Analysis; Youden index

Year:  2020        PMID: 35399822      PMCID: PMC8991305          DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1751852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods        ISSN: 0361-0926            Impact factor:   0.863


  16 in total

1.  Measuring the effectiveness of diagnostic markers in the presence of measurement error through the use of ROC curves.

Authors:  B Reiser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy.

Authors:  M S Pepe; M L Thompson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  A new approach for interval estimation and hypothesis testing of a certain intraclass correlation coefficient: the generalized variable method.

Authors:  Lili Tian; Joseph C Cappelleri
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.

Authors:  Chi-Rong Li; Chen-Tuo Liao; Jen-Pei Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Optimal linear combinations of multiple diagnostic biomarkers based on Youden index.

Authors:  Jingjing Yin; Lili Tian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Multivariate normally distributed biomarkers subject to limits of detection and receiver operating characteristic curve inference.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Combining large number of weak biomarkers based on AUC.

Authors:  Li Yan; Lili Tian; Song Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Exact confidence interval estimation for the Youden index and its corresponding optimal cut-point.

Authors:  Chin-Ying Lai; Lili Tian; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 1.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.