OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to use MRI and histology to compare stereotactic lesioning modalities in a large brain model of thalamotomy. METHODS: A unilateral thalamotomy was performed in piglets utilizing one of 3 stereotactic lesioning modalities: focused ultrasound (FUS), radiofrequency, and radiosurgery. Standard clinical lesioning parameters were used for each treatment; and clinical, MRI, and histological assessments were made at early (< 72 hours), subacute (1 week), and later (1-3 months) time intervals. RESULTS: Histological and MRI assessment showed similar development for FUS and radiofrequency lesions. T2-weighted MRI revealed 3 concentric lesional zones at 48 hours with resolution of perilesional edema by 1 week. Acute ischemic infarction with macrophage infiltration was most prominent at 72 hours, with subsequent resolution of the inflammatory reaction and coalescence of the necrotic zone. There was no apparent difference in ischemic penumbra or "sharpness" between FUS or radiofrequency lesions. The radiosurgery lesions presented differently, with latent effects, less circumscribed lesions at 3 months, and apparent histological changes seen in white matter beyond the thalamic target. Additionally, thermal and radiation lesioning gradients were compared with modeling by dose to examine the theoretical penumbra. CONCLUSIONS: In swine thalamus, FUS and radiosurgery lesions evolve similarly as determined by MRI, histological examination, and theoretical modeling. Radiosurgery produces lesions with more delayed effects and seemed to result in changes in the white matter beyond the thalamic target.
OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to use MRI and histology to compare stereotactic lesioning modalities in a large brain model of thalamotomy. METHODS: A unilateral thalamotomy was performed in piglets utilizing one of 3 stereotactic lesioning modalities: focused ultrasound (FUS), radiofrequency, and radiosurgery. Standard clinical lesioning parameters were used for each treatment; and clinical, MRI, and histological assessments were made at early (< 72 hours), subacute (1 week), and later (1-3 months) time intervals. RESULTS: Histological and MRI assessment showed similar development for FUS and radiofrequency lesions. T2-weighted MRI revealed 3 concentric lesional zones at 48 hours with resolution of perilesional edema by 1 week. Acute ischemic infarction with macrophage infiltration was most prominent at 72 hours, with subsequent resolution of the inflammatory reaction and coalescence of the necrotic zone. There was no apparent difference in ischemic penumbra or "sharpness" between FUS or radiofrequency lesions. The radiosurgery lesions presented differently, with latent effects, less circumscribed lesions at 3 months, and apparent histological changes seen in white matter beyond the thalamic target. Additionally, thermal and radiation lesioning gradients were compared with modeling by dose to examine the theoretical penumbra. CONCLUSIONS: In swine thalamus, FUS and radiosurgery lesions evolve similarly as determined by MRI, histological examination, and theoretical modeling. Radiosurgery produces lesions with more delayed effects and seemed to result in changes in the white matter beyond the thalamic target.
Authors: Nir Lipsman; Todd G Mainprize; Michael L Schwartz; Kullervo Hynynen; Andres M Lozano Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Pejman Ghanouni; Kim Butts Pauly; W Jeff Elias; Jaimie Henderson; Jason Sheehan; Stephen Monteith; Max Wintermark Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Robert F Dallapiazza; Kelsie F Timbie; Stephen Holmberg; Jeremy Gatesman; M Beatriz Lopes; Richard J Price; G Wilson Miller; W Jeffrey Elias Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Jonathan R Sukovich; Charles A Cain; Aditya S Pandey; Neeraj Chaudhary; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Steven P Allen; Timothy L Hall; John Snell; Zhiyuan Xu; Jonathan M Cannata; Dejan Teofilovic; James A Bertolina; Neal Kassell; Zhen Xu Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: M Wintermark; J Druzgal; D S Huss; M A Khaled; S Monteith; P Raghavan; T Huerta; L C Schweickert; B Burkholder; J J Loomba; E Zadicario; Y Qiao; B Shah; J Snell; M Eames; R Frysinger; N Kassell; W J Elias Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-12-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: D Schlesinger; M Lee; G Ter Haar; B Sela; M Eames; J Snell; N Kassell; J Sheehan; J M Larner; J-F Aubry Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Steven P Allen; Francesco Prada; Zhiyuan Xu; Jeremy Gatesman; Xue Feng; Helen Sporkin; Yekaterina Gilbo; Sydney DeCleene; Kim Butts Pauly; Craig H Meyer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Zahabiya Campwala; Benjamin Szewczyk; Teresa Maietta; Rachel Trowbridge; Matthew Tarasek; Chitresh Bhushan; Eric Fiveland; Goutam Ghoshal; Tamas Heffter; Katie Gandomi; Paulo Alberto Carvalho; Christopher Nycz; Erin Jeannotte; Michael Staudt; Julia Nalwalk; Abigail Hellman; Zhanyue Zhao; E Clif Burdette; Gregory Fischer; Desmond Yeo; Julie G Pilitsis Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2021 Impact factor: 3.753