Literature DB >> 23746105

A magnetic resonance imaging, histological, and dose modeling comparison of focused ultrasound, radiofrequency, and Gamma Knife radiosurgery lesions in swine thalamus.

W Jeff Elias1, Mohamad Khaled, Justin D Hilliard, Jean-Francois Aubry, Robert C Frysinger, Jason P Sheehan, Max Wintermark, Maria Beatriz Lopes.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to use MRI and histology to compare stereotactic lesioning modalities in a large brain model of thalamotomy.
METHODS: A unilateral thalamotomy was performed in piglets utilizing one of 3 stereotactic lesioning modalities: focused ultrasound (FUS), radiofrequency, and radiosurgery. Standard clinical lesioning parameters were used for each treatment; and clinical, MRI, and histological assessments were made at early (< 72 hours), subacute (1 week), and later (1-3 months) time intervals.
RESULTS: Histological and MRI assessment showed similar development for FUS and radiofrequency lesions. T2-weighted MRI revealed 3 concentric lesional zones at 48 hours with resolution of perilesional edema by 1 week. Acute ischemic infarction with macrophage infiltration was most prominent at 72 hours, with subsequent resolution of the inflammatory reaction and coalescence of the necrotic zone. There was no apparent difference in ischemic penumbra or "sharpness" between FUS or radiofrequency lesions. The radiosurgery lesions presented differently, with latent effects, less circumscribed lesions at 3 months, and apparent histological changes seen in white matter beyond the thalamic target. Additionally, thermal and radiation lesioning gradients were compared with modeling by dose to examine the theoretical penumbra.
CONCLUSIONS: In swine thalamus, FUS and radiosurgery lesions evolve similarly as determined by MRI, histological examination, and theoretical modeling. Radiosurgery produces lesions with more delayed effects and seemed to result in changes in the white matter beyond the thalamic target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23746105     DOI: 10.3171/2013.5.JNS122327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  19 in total

1.  Offline impact of transcranial focused ultrasound on cortical activation in primates.

Authors:  Lennart Verhagen; Cécile Gallea; Matthew Fs Rushworth; Pierre Pouget; Jean-François Aubry; Jerome Sallet; Davide Folloni; Charlotte Constans; Daria Ea Jensen; Harry Ahnine; Léa Roumazeilles; Mathieu Santin; Bashir Ahmed; Stéphane Lehericy; Miriam C Klein-Flügge; Kristine Krug; Rogier B Mars
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Intracranial applications of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Nir Lipsman; Todd G Mainprize; Michael L Schwartz; Kullervo Hynynen; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  Transcranial MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound: A Review of the Technologic and Neurologic Applications.

Authors:  Pejman Ghanouni; Kim Butts Pauly; W Jeff Elias; Jaimie Henderson; Jason Sheehan; Stephen Monteith; Max Wintermark
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Adaptive Ultrasound Focusing Through the Cranial Bone for Non-invasive Treatment of Brain Disorders.

Authors:  Thomas Bancel; Thomas Tiennot; Jean-François Aubry
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Noninvasive neuromodulation and thalamic mapping with low-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Robert F Dallapiazza; Kelsie F Timbie; Stephen Holmberg; Jeremy Gatesman; M Beatriz Lopes; Richard J Price; G Wilson Miller; W Jeffrey Elias
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  In vivo histotripsy brain treatment.

Authors:  Jonathan R Sukovich; Charles A Cain; Aditya S Pandey; Neeraj Chaudhary; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Steven P Allen; Timothy L Hall; John Snell; Zhiyuan Xu; Jonathan M Cannata; Dejan Teofilovic; James A Bertolina; Neal Kassell; Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Imaging findings in MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound treatment for patients with essential tremor.

Authors:  M Wintermark; J Druzgal; D S Huss; M A Khaled; S Monteith; P Raghavan; T Huerta; L C Schweickert; B Burkholder; J J Loomba; E Zadicario; Y Qiao; B Shah; J Snell; M Eames; R Frysinger; N Kassell; W J Elias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Equivalence of cell survival data for radiation dose and thermal dose in ablative treatments: analysis applied to essential tremor thalamotomy by focused ultrasound and gamma knife.

Authors:  D Schlesinger; M Lee; G Ter Haar; B Sela; M Eames; J Snell; N Kassell; J Sheehan; J M Larner; J-F Aubry
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.914

9.  A preclinical study of diffusion-weighted MRI contrast as an early indicator of thermal ablation.

Authors:  Steven P Allen; Francesco Prada; Zhiyuan Xu; Jeremy Gatesman; Xue Feng; Helen Sporkin; Yekaterina Gilbo; Sydney DeCleene; Kim Butts Pauly; Craig H Meyer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.737

10.  Predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging.

Authors:  Zahabiya Campwala; Benjamin Szewczyk; Teresa Maietta; Rachel Trowbridge; Matthew Tarasek; Chitresh Bhushan; Eric Fiveland; Goutam Ghoshal; Tamas Heffter; Katie Gandomi; Paulo Alberto Carvalho; Christopher Nycz; Erin Jeannotte; Michael Staudt; Julia Nalwalk; Abigail Hellman; Zhanyue Zhao; E Clif Burdette; Gregory Fischer; Desmond Yeo; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 3.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.