| Literature DB >> 34148489 |
Zahabiya Campwala1, Benjamin Szewczyk2,3, Teresa Maietta1, Rachel Trowbridge1, Matthew Tarasek4, Chitresh Bhushan4, Eric Fiveland4, Goutam Ghoshal5, Tamas Heffter5, Katie Gandomi3, Paulo Alberto Carvalho3, Christopher Nycz3, Erin Jeannotte6, Michael Staudt2, Julia Nalwalk1, Abigail Hellman1, Zhanyue Zhao3, E Clif Burdette5, Gregory Fischer3, Desmond Yeo4, Julie G Pilitsis1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) serves as a noninvasive stereotactic system for the ablation of brain metastases; however, treatments are limited to simple geometries and energy delivery is limited by the high acoustic attenuation of the calvarium. Minimally-invasive magnetic resonance-guided robotically-assisted (MRgRA) needle-based therapeutic ultrasound (NBTU) using multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) overcomes these limitations and has potential to produce less collateral tissue damage than current methods.Entities:
Keywords: Brain metastases; focused ultrasound; magnetic resonance thermal imaging; magnetic resonance-guided robotically assisted delivery; needle-based therapeutic ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34148489 PMCID: PMC9284994 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1936215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hyperthermia ISSN: 0265-6736 Impact factor: 3.753
Ablation parameters and volumes.
| Acuity | Side | Probe | Acoustic | Duration (s) | Absolute Maximal | Time to | Histology | MRTI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swine 1 | Acute | Center | 360°, 7mm | 3 | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Right | 360°, 7mm | 3 | 100 | 13.00 | 135 | 2.49 | 0.15 | ||
| Swine 2 | Acute | Center | 360°, 7mm | 3 | 100 | 22.00 | 100 | 0.25 | 0.30 |
| Right | 360°, 7mm | 4 | 100 | 23.07 | 100 | 0.60 | 0.35 | ||
| Swine 3 | Acute | Center | 360°, 7mm | 4 | 120 | 7 | 150 | 3.693 | 0.4 |
| Swine 4 | Acute | Right | 360° | 6 | 180 | 16 | 180 | 0.92 | 0.9 |
| Swine 5 | Subacute | Center | 360°, 7mm | 3 | 120 | 8 | 120 | 0.44 | 0.4 |
| Swine 6 | Subacute | Right | 360°, 7mm | 3 | 120 | 9.6 | 120 | 0.48 | 0.45 |
| Swine 7 | Subacute | Right | 180°, 7mm | 3 | 120 | 10 | 90 | 0.27 | 0.25 |
The probe used for this ablation ablated slightly less than 360° circumferentially (about 320°); this probe was replaced for the next ablation.
The robot stalled and the NBTU probe was manually inserted.
Suboptimal tissue staining led to loss of demarcation of damaged tissue.
Figure 1.Robotic manipulator positioned near the MR scanner.
Figure 2.Clinical workflow of MRgRA delivery of NBTU. Top, left – a burr hole craniotomy is performed to gain access to the intra-cranial space. Top, middle – the Entry Point and Target Point are selected using our TheraVision software (Acoustic MedSystems, Inc., Savoy, IL, USA) and the coordinates are sent to the robot. Top, right – the robot moves into position and the cannula and ACOUSTx® NBTU applicator (Acoustic MedSystems, Inc., Savoy, IL, USA) are mounted to the robot. The robot then inserts the probe to target depth. Bottom, right – the ablation ensues and thermal changes are monitored using MRTI. Bottom, middle – post operative MRI images are obtained. Bottom, left – the brain is dissected and histologic analysis is performed using TTC staining. The area of damage is calculated using ImageJ (NIH funded open access software).
Figure 3.MRTI temperature maps from one acute swine (a) MRI image showing probe location after insertion into swine’s brain. Orthogonal, contiguous MRTI slice placement is shown with shaded blue background indicating the volume of tissue being imaged. (b, top) MRTI maps for slices labeled in (a) set to the maximum heating timepoint. (b, bottom) Improved MRTI software user interface with real-time average temperature plot for a user-drawn ROI in MRTI map.
Figure 4.CEM43 dose maps. Left – Pixel grid of CEM43 dose delivered via NBTU. Right – CEM43 isodose lines derived from the pixel grid. The volume of the necrotic zones was calculated by counting the pixels at the specified CEM43 threshold and multiplying by the 3 pixel dimensions.
Figure 5.The ablation volume is calculated using ImageJ (NIH funded open access software). Left – a ruler adjacent to the coronal brain sections is used to calibrate the software between pixels and cm. Right – the area of ablation damage is outlined and the software calculates the circled area.