OBJECTIVE: Histotripsy is an ultrasound-based treatment modality relying on the generation of targeted cavitation bubble clouds, which mechanically fractionate tissue. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the in vivo feasibility, including dosage requirements and safety, of generating well-confined destructive lesions within the porcine brain utilizing histotripsy technology. METHODS: Following a craniectomy to open an acoustic window to the brain, histotripsy pulses were delivered to generate lesions in the porcine cortex. Large lesions with a major dimension of up to 1 cm were generated to demonstrate the efficacy of histotripsy lesioning in the brain. Gyrus-confined lesions were generated at different applied dosages and under ultrasound imaging guidance to ensure that they were accurately targeted and contained within individual gyri. Clinical evaluation as well as MRI and histological outcomes were assessed in the acute (≤ 6 hours) and subacute (≤ 72 hours) phases of recovery. RESULTS: Histotripsy was able to generate lesions with a major dimension of up to 1 cm in the cortex. Histotripsy lesions were seen to be well demarcated with sharp boundaries between treated and untreated tissues, with histological evidence of injuries extending ≤ 200 µm from their boundaries in all cases. In animals with lesions confined to the gyrus, no major hemorrhage or other complications resulting from treatment were observed. At 72 hours, MRI revealed minimal to no edema and no radiographic evidence of inflammatory changes in the perilesional area. Histological evaluation revealed the histotripsy lesions to be similar to subacute infarcts. CONCLUSIONS: Histotripsy can be used to generate sharply defined lesions of arbitrary shapes and sizes in the swine cortex. Lesions confined to within the gyri did not lead to significant hemorrhage or edema responses at the treatment site in the acute or subacute time intervals.
OBJECTIVE: Histotripsy is an ultrasound-based treatment modality relying on the generation of targeted cavitation bubble clouds, which mechanically fractionate tissue. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the in vivo feasibility, including dosage requirements and safety, of generating well-confined destructive lesions within the porcine brain utilizing histotripsy technology. METHODS: Following a craniectomy to open an acoustic window to the brain, histotripsy pulses were delivered to generate lesions in the porcine cortex. Large lesions with a major dimension of up to 1 cm were generated to demonstrate the efficacy of histotripsy lesioning in the brain. Gyrus-confined lesions were generated at different applied dosages and under ultrasound imaging guidance to ensure that they were accurately targeted and contained within individual gyri. Clinical evaluation as well as MRI and histological outcomes were assessed in the acute (≤ 6 hours) and subacute (≤ 72 hours) phases of recovery. RESULTS: Histotripsy was able to generate lesions with a major dimension of up to 1 cm in the cortex. Histotripsy lesions were seen to be well demarcated with sharp boundaries between treated and untreated tissues, with histological evidence of injuries extending ≤ 200 µm from their boundaries in all cases. In animals with lesions confined to the gyrus, no major hemorrhage or other complications resulting from treatment were observed. At 72 hours, MRI revealed minimal to no edema and no radiographic evidence of inflammatory changes in the perilesional area. Histological evaluation revealed the histotripsy lesions to be similar to subacute infarcts. CONCLUSIONS: Histotripsy can be used to generate sharply defined lesions of arbitrary shapes and sizes in the swine cortex. Lesions confined to within the gyri did not lead to significant hemorrhage or edema responses at the treatment site in the acute or subacute time intervals.
Entities:
Keywords:
H & E = hematoxylin and eosin; HIFU = high-intensity focused ultrasound; ICH = intracerebral hemorrhage; focused ultrasound; histotripsy; intracerebral hemorrhage; neurosurgery; thrombolysis
Authors: Tyler Gerhardson; Jonathan R Sukovich; Aditya S Pandey; Timothy L Hall; Charles A Cain; Zhen Xu Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Eli Vlaisavljevich; Yohan Kim; Gabe Owens; William Roberts; Charles Cain; Zhen Xu Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Jeffery C Wheat; Timothy L Hall; Christopher R Hempel; Charles A Cain; Zhen Xu; William W Roberts Journal: Urology Date: 2009-11-22 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Daniel Coluccia; Javier Fandino; Lucia Schwyzer; Ruth O'Gorman; Luca Remonda; Javier Anon; Ernst Martin; Beat Werner Journal: J Ther Ultrasound Date: 2014-10-16
Authors: Pavel B Rosnitskiy; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Leonid R Gavrilov; Vera A Khokhlova Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Steven P Allen; Tom Steeves; Austin Fergusson; Dave Moore; Richey M Davis; Eli Vlaisialjevich; Craig H Meyer Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Ning Lu; Timothy L Hall; Jonathan R Sukovich; Sang Won Choi; John Snell; Nathan McDannold; Zhen Xu Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 4.174
Authors: Ning Lu; Dinank Gupta; Badih J Daou; Adam Fox; Dave Choi; Jonathan R Sukovich; Timothy L Hall; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Neeraj Chaudhary; John Snell; Aditya S Pandey; Douglas C Noll; Zhen Xu Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2021-10-04 Impact factor: 3.694
Authors: Xinrui Zhang; Lisa Landgraf; Nikolaos Bailis; Michael Unger; Thies H Jochimsen; Andreas Melzer Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ning Lu; Timothy L Hall; Dave Choi; Dinank Gupta; Badih Junior Daou; Jonathan R Sukovich; Adam Fox; Tyler I Gerhardson; Aditya S Pandey; Douglas C Noll; Zhen Xu Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Jonathan R Sukovich; Jonathan J Macoskey; Jonathan E Lundt; Tyler I Gerhardson; Timothy L Hall; Zhen Xu Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 2.725