| Literature DB >> 23737959 |
Eve Gazave1, Dennis V Lavrov, Jory Cabrol, Emmanuelle Renard, Caroline Rocher, Jean Vacelet, Maja Adamska, Carole Borchiellini, Alexander V Ereskovsky.
Abstract
The family Oscarellidae is one of the two families in the class Homoscleromorpha (phylum Porifera) and is characterized by the absence of a skeleton and the presence of a specific mitochondrial gene, tatC. This family currently encompasses sponges in two genera: Oscarella with 17 described species and Pseudocorticium with one described species. Although sponges in this group are relatively well-studied, phylogenetic relationships among members of Oscarellidae and the validity of genus Pseudocorticium remain open questions. Here we present a phylogenetic analysis of Oscarellidae using four markers (18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, atp6, tatC), and argue that it should become a mono-generic family, with Pseudocorticium being synonymized with Oscarella, and with the transfer of Pseudocorticium jarrei to Oscarella jarrei. We show that the genus Oscarella can be subdivided into four clades, each of which is supported by either a small number of morphological characters or by molecular synapomorphies. In addition, we describe two new species of Oscarella from Norwegian fjords: O. bergenensis sp. nov. and O. nicolae sp. nov., and we compare their morphology, anatomy, and cytology with other species in this genus. Internal anatomical characters are similar in both species, but details of external morphology and particularly of cytological characters provide diagnostic features. Our study also confirms that O. lobularis and O. tuberculata are two distinct polychromic sibling species. This study highlights the difficulties of species identification in skeleton-less sponges and, more generally, in groups where morphological characters are scarce. Adopting a multi-marker approach is thus highly suitable for these groups.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23737959 PMCID: PMC3667853 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the collection sites for this study.
The numbers refer to the species locations detailed in Table 1.
List of species/specimens used in this work according to the classification of Systema Porifera [89] and the recent updates added to the World Porifera Database [9].
| GenBank Accession numbers | Collection sites | |||||||
| Species/color morphs | 18S rDNA | 28S rDNA |
|
| Complete mt | Names | Map n° | |
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| HM118536 | HM118549 | HQ269361 | HQ269361 | HQ269361 | Marseille, France(Coral cave) | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | Marseille, France(Passe Tiboulen) | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | Marseille, France(Passe Tiboulen) | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | Marseille, France(Passe Tiboulen) | 1 |
|
|
| – | – |
|
|
| Marseille, France(Passe Tiboulen) | 1 |
|
|
|
|
| HQ269353 | HQ269353 | HQ269353 | Marseille, France(La Vesse) | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | Marseille, France(La Vesse) | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | Marseille, France(La Vesse) | 1 |
|
|
|
|
| – |
| – | Marseille, France(La Vesse) | 1 |
|
|
| EU702422 | EF654519 | NC_009090 | NC_009090 | NC_009090 | California, USA(Carmel Bay) | 2 |
|
|
| HM118537 | HM118550 | HQ269364 | HQ269364 | HQ269364 | Japan Sea, Russia(Vostok Bay) | 3 |
|
|
|
| – | HQ269358 | HQ269358 | HQ269358 | Marseille, France(Jarre Cave) | 1 |
|
|
| HM118538 | HM118551 | HQ269355 | HQ269355 | HQ269355 | Marseille, France(Jarre Cave) | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | Avacha Gulf,Kamchatka(Starichkov Island) | 4 |
|
| n/a |
|
|
|
|
| Marseille, France(Maire Island) | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | Ria d’Etel, France | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| – | Marseille, France(Coral Cave) | 1 |
|
| – |
|
|
|
| – | Bergen, Norway(Skarvoysundet) | 6 |
|
| n/a |
|
|
|
| – | Bergen, Norway(Skarvoysundet) | 6 |
|
| – |
|
|
|
| – | Bergen, Norway(Skarvoysundet) | 6 |
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| HM118539 | HM118552 | HQ269357 | HQ269357 | HQ269357 | Marseille, France(Jarre Cave) | 1 |
The collection sites and the GenBank accession numbers of the four markers and of the complete mitochondrial genomes are indicated. In the sequence column, the new sequence accession numbers are written in bold.
Three sets of non-molecular characters-states for each species/specimen: ecology/geography, external morphology and associated microbes.
| Clade | Ecology/Geography | External morphology | Associated microbes | ||||
| Locality | Habitat | Color | Consistency | Surface | Density ofbacteria | ||
|
|
| Med | Semi-obscurecaves | White Orange | Soft mucous Slimy | Corrugated Lumpy microlobate | LMA |
|
|
| N-W Pacific | Boulders Rocks | Orange Yellow | Soft slimy | Lumpy Microlobate | LMA |
|
|
| E North Sea | Rocks Algae | Ivory yellowish | Delicate mucous | Microlobate | LMA |
|
|
| Med | Obscure caves | Cream | Firm Cartilaginous | Smooth Slippery Corrugate Folded | HMA |
|
|
| Med | Obscure caves | Light green | Soft fragile | Rugose | LMA |
|
|
| N-W Pacific | Bivalve shells Stones | Pinky Yellow | Soft slimy | Lumpy Undulated Microlobate | LMA |
|
|
| N-E Pacific | Boulders | Light brown Orange | Soft slimy | Lumpy Microlobate | LMA |
|
|
| Med | Semi-obscurecaves, Walls | Variable | Soft | Smooth | LMA |
|
|
| Med | Semi-obscurecaves Walls | Variable | Cartilaginous | Wrinkled | LMA |
|
|
| E Atlantic | Bivalve shells Stones | Yellow Red Orange | Soft cartilaginous | Lumpy Microlobate | LMA |
|
|
| Med | Bryozoan sand bottom | Purple | Soft | Microlobate | LMA |
|
|
| E North Sea | Rocks Algae | Pink | Delicate Resilience | Smooth Small wrinkles | LMA |
|
|
| E North Sea | Rocks Algae | Red Orange | Soft | Smooth Small wrinkles | LMA |
|
|
| Med | Obscure caves | Light brown | Soft fragile | Rugose | HMA |
Clades defined by molecular data are indicated (a “?” is given for O. microlobata for which the position is unclear). Med: Mediterranean Sea; LMA: low microbial abundance; HMA: high microbial abundance.
Histology, cytology and embryology morphological characters-states for each species/specimen.
| Clade | Histology/Cytology | Embryology | |||||||||||
| Cortex | Canalsystem | Choanocytechambers | Archaeocyte | Vacuolarcells | Granularcells | Spherulouscells | Spherulouscells withpara-crystallineinclusions | Basementmembrane | Cinctoblastulalarva | Multipolaringression | Asynchronousspermatogenesis | ||
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | No | 1T | 1T | No | 1T | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | No | No | 2T | No | 1T | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | Yes | No | 1T | No | 1T | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
| Yes | Leuconoid | Diplodal | No | No | 3T | No | 1T | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | Yes | 1T | 1T | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | Rare | 1T | 1T | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | Yes | 1T | 1T | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | No | 2T | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | Yes | 1T | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | No | 1T | 1T | No | No | Yes | Yes | ? | Yes |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | Yes | 1T | 1T | No | No | Yes | Yes | ? | ? |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | Rare | 1T | 1T | No | No | Yes | Yes | ? | ? |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | Rare | 1T | 1T | No | No | Yes | Yes | ? | ? |
|
|
| No | Sylleibid | Eurypylous | No | 1T | 1T | 1T | 1T | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Clades defined by molecular data are indicated. 1T: one type; 2T: two types: 3T: three types.
Identity values between members of clade D for mitochondrial markers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ID | ||||||||||||
|
| −/0.998 | ID | |||||||||||
|
| −/0.994 | 0.996/0.995 | ID | ||||||||||
|
| −/0.998 | 1/1 | 0.996/0.995 | ID | |||||||||
|
| −/0.998 | 1/1 | 0.996/0.995 | 1/1 | ID | ||||||||
|
| −/0.989 | 0.996/0.991 | 0.996/0.992 | 0.996/0.991 | 0.996/0.991 | ID | |||||||
|
| −/0.989 | 0.996/0.991 | 0.996/0.992 | 0.996/0.991 | 0.996/0.991 | 1/1 | ID | ||||||
|
| −/0.989 | 0.996/0.991 | 0.996/0.992 | 0.996/0.991 | 0.996/0.991 | 1/1 | 1/1 | ID | |||||
|
| −/0.980 | 0.990/0.982 | 0.990/0.983 | 0.990/0.982 | 0.990/0.982 | 0.993/0.985 | 0.993/0.985 | 0.993/0.985 | ID | ||||
|
| −/0.986 | 0.992/0.988 | 0.992/0.989 | 0.992/0.988 | 0.992/0.988 | 0.995/0.991 | 0.995/0.991 | 0.995/0.991 | 0.995/0.982 | ID | |||
|
| −/0.989 | 0.992/0.991 | 0.992/0.992 | 0.992/0.991 | 0.992/0.991 | 0.995/0.994 | 0.995/0.994 | 0.995/0.994 | 0.995/0.985 | 1/0.994 | ID | ||
|
| −/0.991 | 0.992/0.992 | 0.992/0.994 | 0.992/0.992 | 0.992/0.992 | 0.995/0.995 | 0.995/0.995 | 0.995/0.995 | 0.995/0.986 | 1/0.995 | 1/0.998 | ID | |
|
| −/0.991 | 0.992/0.992 | 0.992/0.994 | 0.992/0.992 | 0.992/0.992 | 0.995/0.995 | 0.995/0.995 | 0.995/0.995 | 0.995/0.986 | 1/0.995 | 1/0.998 | 1/1 | ID |
The upper figure in each cell is for atp6 and the lower for tatC,. O. lob: Oscarella lobularis; O. tub: O. tuberculata.
Nucleotide diversity (π) of Oscarella lobularis, O. tuberculata and D3 members compared to Demospongiae species for the atp6 marker.
| Species | Number of sequences | Number of populations/localities | π | References |
|
| 3 | 1 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 2 | 1 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 9 | 3 | 0.017 |
|
|
| 10 | 2 | 0.001 |
|
|
| 14 | 4 | 0.001 |
|
|
| 8 | 2 | 0.001 |
|
|
| 4 | 1 | 0.000 | This study |
|
| 4 | 1 | 0.001 | This study |
| D3 sequences | 3 | − | 0.000 | This study |
|
| 8 | 2 | 0.005 | This study |
For each species (or cluster), the number of sequences as well as of populations/localities is indicated.
Figure 2Phylogenetic analysis of nuclear markers.
(A) 18S rDNA and (B) 28S rDNA. The topologies presented are posterior consensus trees obtained by the BI analysis using MrBayes. Similar topologies were obtained in ML analysis with PhyML. The numbers are posterior probabilities for BI and bootstrap values (>50) for ML.
Figure 3Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial markers.
(A) atp6 and (B) tatC. The topologies presented are posterior consensus trees obtained by the BI analysis using MrBayes. Similar topologies were obtained in ML analysis with PhyML. The numbers are posterior probabilities for BI and bootstrap values (>50) for ML.
Figure 4Oscarellidae relationships based on the analyses of concatenated sequences.
(A) 18S rDNA +28S rDNA nuclear markers, (B) atp6+ tatC mitochondrial markers and (C) nuclear (18S rDNA +28S rDNA)+mitochondrial (atp6+ tatC) markers. The topologies presented are posterior consensus trees obtained by the BI analysis using MrBayes. Similar topologies were obtained in ML analysis with PhyML. The numbers are posterior probabilities for BI and bootstrap values (>50) for ML.
Figure 5Schemas of the secondary structure predictions of the 18S rDNA V4 region mapped on the 18S rDNA tree topology.
Elements composing the structures and included in the characters matrix are circled in a specific color. Characters that can be considered as synapomorphies are mentioned next to the corresponding node.
Figure 6Oscarella bergenensis sp. nov.
(A) External morphology in vivo. (B) General anatomy, observed with light microscopy. (C) TEM of exopinacocyte. (D) TEM of endopinacocyte. (E) TEM of apopylar cell. (F) TEM of choanocyte. (G) TEM of archaeocyte. (H) TEM of vacuolar cells. (I) TEM of granular cells. (J) TEM of symbiotic bacteria. (b) Symbiotic bacteria; (bm) Basement membrane; (cc) Choanocyte chamber; (ec) Ectosome; (exc) Exhalant canal; (exp) Exopinacodem; (f) Flagellum; (gc) Glycocalyx; (gr) Granules; (mv) Microvilli; (n) Nucleus; (o) Osculum; (v) Vacuole. Scale bar: J = 0.5 µm.
Figure 7Oscarella nicolae sp. nov.
(A) External morphology in vivo. (B) General anatomy, observed with light microscopy. (C) Light microscopy, details of hermaphrodite sponge during reproduction. (D) TEM of exopinacocyte. (E) TEM of endopinacocyte. (F) TEM of apopylar cell. (G) TEM of choanocyte. (H) TEM of archaeocyte. (I) TEM of granular cell. (J) TEM of spherulous cells with paracrystalline inclusions. (K) TEM of symbiotic bacteria. (b) Symbiotic bacteria; (bm) Basement membrane; (cc) Choanocyte chamber; (cpi) Spherulous cells with paracrystalline inclusions; (ec) Ectosome; (em) Embryos; (exc) Exhalant canal; (exp) Exopinacoderm; (f) Flagellum; (fo) Follicle; (gc) Glycocalyx; (gr) Granules; (n) Nucleus; (o) Osculum; (oo) Oocyte; (pcr) Spherules with paracrystalline inclusions; (sp) Spermatic cyst. Scale bar: J = 0.5 µm.
Figure 8Simplified consensus tree based on tatC+atp6 molecular phylogenies.
All robust nodes (BP>50+ PP>0.5) were conserved. Polytomy was prioritized for weakly-supported nodes (BP<50 or PP<0.5). Molecular and non-molecular characters that are synapomorphies/diagnostic characters of the clades are indicated on the corresponding nodes. The absence of vacuolar cells (1) is diagnostic of A. The presence of cortex (2), leuconoid aquiferous system (3) and diplodal chambers (4) are specific characters of Oscarella jarrei. The presence of vacuolar cells in O. balibaloi is a reversal character (5) The two new species names are indicated in bold in the tree. In light grey are specimen/species for which uncertainties remain (new species or not). Schemas of morphological characters are modified from [60] or are new.