Literature DB >> 34623892

Role of MRI in diagnosing the primary site of origin in indeterminate cases of uterocervical carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pooja Jain1, Ankita Aggarwal1, Rohini Gupta Ghasi1, Amita Malik1, Ritu Nair Misra1, Kanwaljeet Garg2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a literature review assessing role of MRI in predicting origin of indeterminate uterocervical carcinomas with emphasis on sequences and imaging parameters.
METHODS: Electronic literature search of PubMed was performed from its inception until May 2020 and PICO model used for study selection; population was female patients with known/clinical suspicion of uterocervical cancer, intervention was MRI, comparison was by histopathology and outcome was differentiation between primary endometrial and cervical cancers.
RESULTS: Eight out of nine reviewed articles reinforced role of MRI in uterocervical primary determination. T2 and Dynamic contrast were the most popular sequences determining tumor location, morphology, enhancement, and invasion patterns. Role of DWI and MR spectroscopy has been evaluated by even fewer studies with significant differences found in both apparent diffusion coefficient values and metabolite spectra. The four studies eligible for meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 88.4% (95% confidence interval 70.6 to 96.1%) and a pooled specificity of 39.5% (95% confidence interval 4.2 to 90.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: MRI plays a pivotal role in uterocervical primary determination with both conventional and newer sequences assessing important morphometric and functional parameters. Socioeconomic impact of both primaries, different management guidelines and paucity of existing studies warrants further research. Prospective multicenter trials will help bridge this gap. Meanwhile, individual patient database meta-analysis can help corroborate existing data. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MRI with its classical and functional sequences helps in differentiation of the uterine 'cancer gray zone' which is imperative as both primary endometrial and cervical tumors have different management protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34623892      PMCID: PMC8722231          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  28 in total

1.  A panel of immunohistochemical stains, including carcinoembryonic antigen, vimentin, and estrogen receptor, aids the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  W Glenn McCluggage; V Palaniappan Sumathi; Hilary A McBride; Anna Patterson
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Predicting control of primary tumor and survival by DCE MRI during early therapy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  William T C Yuh; Nina A Mayr; David Jarjoura; Dee Wu; John C Grecula; Simon S Lo; Susan M Edwards; Vincent A Magnotta; Steffen Sammet; Hualin Zhang; Joseph F Montebello; Jeffrey Fowler; Michael V Knopp; Jian Z Wang
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Impact of MRI in the management and staging of cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Kristina Stenstedt; Ann-Cathrin Hellström; Susanne Fridsten; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  The value of MR imaging when the site of uterine cancer origin is uncertain.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Junting Zheng; Chaya Moskowitz; Robert Soslow; Nadeem Abu-Rustum; Richard R Barakat; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Adenocarcinoma involving the uterine cervix: magnetic resonance imaging findings in tumours of endometrial, compared with cervical, origin.

Authors:  Masoom A Haider; Michael Patlas; Kartik Jhaveri; William Chapman; Anthony Fyles; Barry Rosen
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 6.  Endometrial Cancer: An Overview of Pathophysiology, Management, and Care.

Authors:  Kelly Passarello; Shiney Kurian; Valerie Villanueva
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 7.  What's New in Imaging for Gynecologic Cancer?

Authors:  Sairah R Khan; Mubarik Arshad; Kathryn Wallitt; Victoria Stewart; Nishat Bharwani; Tara D Barwick
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  MRI is highly specific in determining primary cervical versus endometrial cancer when biopsy results are inconclusive.

Authors:  H He; P Bhosale; W Wei; P Ramalingam; R Iyer
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to detect synchronous uterine endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jesus Paul Carvalho; Publio Viana; Cristina Anton; Giovanni Favero; Alexandre Silva E Silva; Edmund Chada Baracat; Filomena Marino Carvalho
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2012-03-20

Review 10.  Role of MRI in staging and follow-up of endometrial and cervical cancer: pitfalls and mimickers.

Authors:  María Milagros Otero-García; Alicia Mesa-Álvarez; Olivera Nikolic; Patricia Blanco-Lobato; Marijana Basta-Nikolic; Rafael Menéndez de Llano-Ortega; Laura Paredes-Velázquez; Nikola Nikolic; Magda Szewczyk-Bieda
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-02-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Preliminary Application of Magnetization Transfer Imaging in the Study of Normal Uterus and Uterine Lesions.

Authors:  Qiu Bi; Qing Li; Jing Yang; Junyu Yang; Ji Du; Fan Ding; Yunzhu Wu; Shaoyu Wang; Ying Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.